Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

Showing Original Post only (View all)

The Straight Story

(48,121 posts)
Thu Jan 5, 2012, 11:01 AM Jan 2012

Photo-Sharing Site Need not Self-Police [View all]

Photo-Sharing Site Need not Self-Police

MANHATTAN (CN) - Kodak's photo-sharing social media website does not have the responsibility to police 9 billion of its images for evidence of copyright infringement, a federal judge ruled.

Sheila Wolk, a professional artist for more than 40 years, runs an online store that exclusively sells her work, but says she did not even know what a URL was before she signed up with Photobucket.com.

She took advantage of a feature that allowed her to put a watermark on her pictures to prevent users from downloading her images without paying her. She says she did not know that the software gives users tools to remove the mark.

In late 2007 or early 2008, Wolk noticed that her images were being copied, displayed and modified by other users. She told Photobucket about it months later.

http://www.courthousenews.com/2012/01/05/42765.htm

2 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Photo-Sharing Site Need n...