Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

hlthe2b

(114,187 posts)
19. More legal analysis in light of idiot's threat:
Thu Jun 27, 2019, 02:30 PM
Jun 2019
https://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-court-census/trump-fumes-as-supreme-court-blocks-census-citizenship-question-idUSKCN1TS1BL

As part of the ruling issued on the last day of the court’s current term, the justices sent the issue back to the Commerce Department for it to decide whether to provide a different rationale for requiring people taking part in the census to declare whether they are citizens.

The clock is ticking, with the administration previously saying that census forms needed to be printed in the coming days. A determination from a federal agency normally would take weeks or months.

“There is really no time. And if the administration tries to rush it that is clearly a red flag,” said Dale Ho, a lawyer with the American Civil Liberties Union, one of the challengers.

Jason Torchinsky, a lawyer and Republican redistricting strategist, said the deadline could be extended to the fall, which would enable the Supreme Court to review the new decision.
“They don’t need to redo the entire administrative process, they just need to better justify what they did, in a way that can satisfy the Supreme Court,” Torchinsky said.

Justice Department spokeswoman Kelly Laco said the administration is disappointed by the Supreme Court’s decision. “The Department of Justice will continue to defend this administration’s lawful exercises of executive power,” Laco said in a statement.

The census, required by the U.S. Constitution, is used to allot seats in the U.S. House and distribute some $800 billion in federal funds. Opponents have said the question would instill fear in immigrant households that the information would be shared with law enforcement, deterring them from taking part.

Further muddying the waters, there is also ongoing litigation in lower courts over recently unearthed evidence that the challengers have said reveals an illegal discriminatory motive by the administration for adding the question, which the high court could yet weigh in on.

The court ruled against the challengers in a separate 5-4 vote, with all the conservative justices in the majority, that the U.S. Constitution does not in theory prevent the administration or a future one from adding a citizenship question.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

And Former Federal Prosecutor Renato Mariotti replies: hlthe2b Jun 2019 #1
Disconcerting comment from Laurence Tribe (no he doesn't give legal credence, but....) hlthe2b Jun 2019 #17
Idiot. I think the census is one thing provided for by the constitution that is not bound by any .. SWBTATTReg Jun 2019 #2
Every ten years is the binding rule. Timing is specific. He can't delay hlthe2b Jun 2019 #5
Thanks. I thought so. Take care. NT SWBTATTReg Jun 2019 #9
Jesus Christ this man is a fucking idiot. joshcryer Jun 2019 #3
Also, you shouldn't use the census as a method of voter suppression FakeNoose Jun 2019 #4
The really scary part is that yes, tavernier Jun 2019 #18
Sure, let's delay the inevitable demographic death of the GOP maxsolomon Jun 2019 #6
Good grief ScratchCat Jun 2019 #7
I think the Supreme Court was aware of the additional information and it wasn't Vinca Jun 2019 #8
Axios... spanone Jun 2019 #10
Fucker thinks he's bigger than the Constitution malaise Jun 2019 #13
Georgetown Law School: Prof Joshua Geltze predicts decision will be "last word" on critical issue hlthe2b Jun 2019 #15
Who pays these lawyers? GusBob Jun 2019 #11
Pretty sure he means to delay it until RBG dies so he can pack the court bigbrother05 Jun 2019 #12
No means no. C_U_L8R Jun 2019 #14
Fucking Constitution, how does it work? Miracles! Initech Jun 2019 #16
More legal analysis in light of idiot's threat: hlthe2b Jun 2019 #19
"The trouble with ignorance is that it feels so much like expertise" gtar100 Jun 2019 #20
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»The Twit tweets: I have a...»Reply #19