Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: How would Medicare for All Work? Medicare today is viable because people have paid 30+ years into [View all]Everyman Jackal
(271 posts)64. Employers do not actually pay anything towards the workers medical insurance.
Employers figure out how much they can pay a worker. That is the gross amount. Then they subtract everything they have to pay for having that worker work for them. What is left is what they pay their worker hourly or a salary. Simple, let's say that an employer can afford to pay a worker $18/hour. The employer's cost except pay is $6/hour. The worker is then paid $12/hour. That is a very simplified example, but I think I got it right.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
72 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
How would Medicare for All Work? Medicare today is viable because people have paid 30+ years into [View all]
still_one
Jun 2019
OP
Actually The Canadian system would be most compatible wither ours, though I think we should not
still_one
Jun 2019
#29
Thanks for that insight. I had the impression it was managed differently in Canada than UK
still_one
Jun 2019
#37
I'm all for loan forgiveness for health care profesisonals. Federal tax exemptions on their incomes.
Yavin4
Jun 2019
#14
This is why Medicare for all will never happen, unfortunately. Doctor/Pharma/Hospital lobbies
Blaukraut
Jun 2019
#19
Employers do not actually pay anything towards the workers medical insurance.
Everyman Jackal
Jun 2019
#64
I do not understand why we have to detail anything at this time? Even if someone
Laura PourMeADrink
Jun 2019
#11
Not a problem. From my perspective it is very complicated, and just trying to get a little bit of
still_one
Jun 2019
#22
Hey, at least we're talking about it, MfAll, etc., and all the repugs want to do is dismantle ...
SWBTATTReg
Jun 2019
#27
Isn't Medicare today a government health insurance program for most people 65 or older,
still_one
Jun 2019
#25
Maybe you don't give a trillion dollars in tax cuts to fat cats and pay for medical care instead.
Vinca
Jun 2019
#26
I agree mostly with what you are saying, but I think we should leave Medicare alone, and
still_one
Jun 2019
#31
Exactly. The counter is, do docs have to make over $200K, does every hospital have to
Hoyt
Jun 2019
#36
Docs don't have to make $200k we can lower it to whatever society feels is right
fescuerescue
Jun 2019
#41
If we get where we need a million $200+K jobs in weapons development, we are screwed
Hoyt
Jun 2019
#47
I agree with you, I don't want Medicare interferred with either. What I would not mind seeing
still_one
Jun 2019
#52
Appreciate the historical perspective. I do not agree with your assessment that health insurers
still_one
Jun 2019
#55
My first post!! :) America is built upon greed and selfishness. This isn't Europe.
5starlib
Jun 2019
#67
I think you're not wrong, but I also think it would be an acceptable tax increase
Volaris
Jun 2019
#69