Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

1. Are you talking about Rep. *Omar*? 2. Why does one man have so much power? ck4829 Jun 2019 #1
Yes Thank You...Made The Correction Me. Jun 2019 #3
The only way to change that is to stop criticizing our own but stick together and get a few.... George II Jun 2019 #39
Message auto-removed Name removed Jun 2019 #41
But then you will not get headlines and remain in the news, now question everything Jun 2019 #55
Oh look! A camera, a camera! Getting tiresome. justhanginon Jun 2019 #76
Or we could just slam Democrats on a regular basis mcar Jun 2019 #74
That bill allows the corporations who are already getting paid a Bettie Jun 2019 #2
It Is Admittedly Less Than What The Dems Wanted Me. Jun 2019 #5
True, it's a gamble whether it will help the children. Turin_C3PO Jun 2019 #8
It will get the needed soap, toothpaste, blankets and beds to the children being held. George II Jun 2019 #40
No, it isn't a bad thing Bettie Jun 2019 #50
Can you point to anywhere nabil they say they guarantee it would do any of that? uponit7771 Jun 2019 #86
Democrats have compassion and want to govern, repugs extort them to get what they want happyaccident Jun 2019 #78
this entire thing was 100% on the No Labels/Problem Solvers/Blue Dog clique Celerity Jun 2019 #92
She answered the question regarding cutting deals regarding children lives tulipsandroses Jun 2019 #4
I Disagree With Her Use Of The Word Appeasers Me. Jun 2019 #6
I'm generally not in favor of appropriating historically significant language lapucelle Jun 2019 #26
Especially When You Know When It Became Especially Prominent Me. Jun 2019 #29
We had to pass the bill. Turin_C3PO Jun 2019 #7
She's correct though. katiewritescode Jun 2019 #9
So You Agree With Her Then Me. Jun 2019 #11
I think Pelosi is an old time dem who still believes CrispyQ Jun 2019 #16
Disagree With Your Analysis Me. Jun 2019 #19
To answer your third question, CrispyQ Jun 2019 #21
I Quite Agree With That Me. Jun 2019 #23
Divisive would be keep caving to Republicans and not fighting in the first place. katiewritescode Jun 2019 #44
I Refer You To Post #20 Me. Jun 2019 #45
You mean actually put the kids' needs first? Isn't that "caving?" ehrnst Jun 2019 #47
I Think THe Times Called It Weakness Me. Jun 2019 #48
Well, trashing her as "weak" is certainly easier than presenting an alternative ehrnst Jun 2019 #49
But Isn't That What They Always Do With The Dems Me. Jun 2019 #52
And what assurances do you have from McConnell and Trump katiewritescode Jun 2019 #85
What is your alternative to legislation to help those kids? Still waiting for an answer to that... ehrnst Jul 2019 #109
The alternative would be to not cave and strip out the amendments katiewritescode Jul 2019 #116
Not passing any bill is not an alternative to legislation that helps those kids ehrnst Jul 2019 #117
I Vote For The Hypnosis Option... Me. Jul 2019 #122
Oh, right. Those kids. Keep forgetting that they're the reason for this, not giving ehrnst Jul 2019 #123
Got nothing? ehrnst Jul 2019 #127
So wait and "don't fight" until 2020 to "run on them being obstructionists." ehrnst Jun 2019 #46
This message was self-deleted by its author ehrnst Jun 2019 #79
How would such an ad campaign get rid of RW talk radio? onenote Jun 2019 #28
It wouldn't. CrispyQ Jun 2019 #56
+1000. (nt) ehrnst Jun 2019 #27
You think that Pelosi should act like the Tea Partiers, and let those kids suffer more ehrnst Jun 2019 #32
Pft. I have no idea where you got that from my post but whatever. CrispyQ Jun 2019 #61
Mea culpa. My mistake. ehrnst Jun 2019 #62
No problem. CrispyQ Jun 2019 #64
"If THEY had been a strong & outspoken opposition party the past 45 years..." lapucelle Jun 2019 #51
Referring to dem leadership, DNC and any other national dem/leftist orgs over the years. CrispyQ Jun 2019 #53
"If THEY had been a strong and outspoken opposition PARTY..." lapucelle Jun 2019 #65
Good point. (nt) ehrnst Jun 2019 #68
I'm a Pelosi fan from way back. cwydro Jul 2019 #119
You're Entitled Me. Jul 2019 #121
If this president is not enough for her to start an impeachment inquiry - cwydro Jul 2019 #124
Honestly Me. Jul 2019 #125
Why we need a strong progressive leader like Bernie in the White House who is not afraid InAbLuEsTaTe Jun 2019 #13
So where was he when the vote went to the Senate? ehrnst Jun 2019 #30
I'm tired of "Democrats" complaining about other Democrats not voting with the party... George II Jun 2019 #36
What Ehrnst said EffieBlack Jun 2019 #97
Crickets from the Sanders fans redstateblues Jun 2019 #103
Bam! cwydro Jul 2019 #120
Crickets... ehrnst Jul 2019 #112
More crickets... ehrnst Jul 2019 #118
+1 ck4829 Jun 2019 #14
They didn't "get rid of...." them, they never had them. Anyone who voted against that bill.... George II Jun 2019 #20
Excellent Point Me. Jun 2019 #24
Indeed. I'm hearing lots of familiar GOP-sounding talking points about the social safety net... ehrnst Jul 2019 #113
And what was the alternative? ehrnst Jun 2019 #33
It's like that silly Wayfare walkout last week. It's sad that some people who claim to be worried.. George II Jun 2019 #37
I given them money so they don't spend it on taking care of the kids? uponit7771 Jun 2019 #87
What does that mean? ehrnst Jun 2019 #93
Post removed Post removed Jun 2019 #10
Really? Me. Jun 2019 #12
Indeed ck4829 Jun 2019 #15
from what I've heard KayF Jun 2019 #17
That Is My Impression Too Me. Jun 2019 #18
+1, some how this got or if the Senate without a fight uponit7771 Jun 2019 #88
Bingo. shanny Jul 2019 #126
I see little advantage to calling fellow democrats names. Tech Jun 2019 #22
Agree Me. Jun 2019 #25
Some seem to forget who is on the wrong side of history, and who is on the right side. (nt) ehrnst Jun 2019 #70
That's unfortunate. That word is loaded, and a lot of people won't look beyond that. Iggo Jun 2019 #31
What was the alternative? (nt) ehrnst Jun 2019 #34
To...? Iggo Jun 2019 #57
To what Pelosi did. ehrnst Jun 2019 #58
How does this help? Iggo Jun 2019 #66
Not going to answer the question? (nt) ehrnst Jun 2019 #67
You, either? Iggo Jun 2019 #95
I asked you a question, and you evaded it. ehrnst Jul 2019 #107
No longer recognizing McConnell as a legitimate leader of the Senate? ck4829 Jul 2019 #108
What does it con-notate? ConnorMarc Jun 2019 #54
So do I. Iggo Jun 2019 #59
I am deeply sorry that you do now know what .."Appeasers" means. Or what it con-notate.. Stuart G Jun 2019 #72
So a policy of appeasement is something that can ONLY Crunchy Frog Jun 2019 #94
It's Because That Begining Of THe Usage Was A Very Singluar Event Me. Jun 2019 #96
The meaning of the term is not limited to that singular event Crunchy Frog Jun 2019 #98
Nonsense Me. Jun 2019 #100
I really hope she draws a strong primary challenger. tritsofme Jun 2019 #35
She Certainly RobinA Jun 2019 #99
Certainly Not If She Wants To Work In Accord With Her Colleagues Me. Jun 2019 #101
Is there a hint of anti-Muslim sentiment in your posts? ConnorMarc Jun 2019 #102
Because what other reason could someone oppose your demigod? tritsofme Jul 2019 #104
+1 ck4829 Jul 2019 #106
Here is the video- Judge for yourselves- tulipsandroses Jun 2019 #38
You Actually Did Not Hear Her Call The Members Of The House Appeasers? Me. Jun 2019 #42
I've already said what I said - Others can watch the video and judge for themselves tulipsandroses Jun 2019 #43
So you're going to avoid answering the question? ehrnst Jun 2019 #60
Watch it CC... lapucelle Jun 2019 #63
There you have it! sheshe2 Jun 2019 #77
She uses the expression again later in her segment. lapucelle Jun 2019 #80
Nice Work Me. Jun 2019 #81
And Let's Not Forget Joy Me. Jun 2019 #89
I have stopped watching her, Me. sheshe2 Jun 2019 #90
I'm On The Edge With Her Me. Jun 2019 #91
Rep. Omar is totally wrong..We are not "Appeasers". Stuart G Jun 2019 #69
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ Me. Jun 2019 #83
When it comes to kids being incarcerated, debating the conditions of incarceration is a pretty good WhiskeyGrinder Jun 2019 #71
You debate, when you can debate..If you read the news, some Congress Members are Stuart G Jun 2019 #73
We know what the conditions are, and they know they're not going to be allowed in. WhiskeyGrinder Jun 2019 #84
Did anyone on the show mention the Republicans mcar Jun 2019 #75
I'm Not Sure About The SEnate DEms Me. Jun 2019 #82
Rep Omar should be ashamed of herself Cha Jul 2019 #105
Now That's Interesting Me. Jul 2019 #114
Yeah.. I'm not impressed Cha Jul 2019 #115
Thank you for standing for me, Rep. Omar! RandiFan1290 Jul 2019 #110
Yes! ck4829 Jul 2019 #111
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Rep. Omar Just Referred T...»Reply #18