General Discussion

Me.

(35,454 posts)

100. Nonsense

Sun Jun 30, 2019, 10:46 PM

Jun 2019

It certainly has been. Give google a check and see what comes up first, second and so on. It still remains the primary reference. And the reason not to use it because it is both untrue and meant to be deliberately insulting to her colleagues. Interesting that someone in Congress for a scant six months would be so 'undiplomatic'. It is certainly no way to win the support of others.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

127 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Rep. Omar Just Referred To The Dems As Appeasers Several Times [View all] Me. Jun 2019 OP

1. Are you talking about Rep. *Omar*? 2. Why does one man have so much power? ck4829 Jun 2019 #1

Yes Thank You...Made The Correction Me. Jun 2019 #3

The only way to change that is to stop criticizing our own but stick together and get a few.... George II Jun 2019 #39

Message auto-removed Name removed Jun 2019 #41

But then you will not get headlines and remain in the news, now question everything Jun 2019 #55

Oh look! A camera, a camera! Getting tiresome. justhanginon Jun 2019 #76

Or we could just slam Democrats on a regular basis mcar Jun 2019 #74

That bill allows the corporations who are already getting paid a Bettie Jun 2019 #2

It Is Admittedly Less Than What The Dems Wanted Me. Jun 2019 #5

True, it's a gamble whether it will help the children. Turin_C3PO Jun 2019 #8

It will get the needed soap, toothpaste, blankets and beds to the children being held. George II Jun 2019 #40

No, it isn't a bad thing Bettie Jun 2019 #50

Can you point to anywhere nabil they say they guarantee it would do any of that? uponit7771 Jun 2019 #86

Democrats have compassion and want to govern, repugs extort them to get what they want happyaccident Jun 2019 #78

this entire thing was 100% on the No Labels/Problem Solvers/Blue Dog clique Celerity Jun 2019 #92

She answered the question regarding cutting deals regarding children lives tulipsandroses Jun 2019 #4

I Disagree With Her Use Of The Word Appeasers Me. Jun 2019 #6

I'm generally not in favor of appropriating historically significant language lapucelle Jun 2019 #26

Especially When You Know When It Became Especially Prominent Me. Jun 2019 #29

We had to pass the bill. Turin_C3PO Jun 2019 #7

She's correct though. katiewritescode Jun 2019 #9

So You Agree With Her Then Me. Jun 2019 #11

I think Pelosi is an old time dem who still believes CrispyQ Jun 2019 #16

Disagree With Your Analysis Me. Jun 2019 #19

To answer your third question, CrispyQ Jun 2019 #21

I Quite Agree With That Me. Jun 2019 #23

Divisive would be keep caving to Republicans and not fighting in the first place. katiewritescode Jun 2019 #44

I Refer You To Post #20 Me. Jun 2019 #45

You mean actually put the kids' needs first? Isn't that "caving?" ehrnst Jun 2019 #47

I Think THe Times Called It Weakness Me. Jun 2019 #48

Well, trashing her as "weak" is certainly easier than presenting an alternative ehrnst Jun 2019 #49

But Isn't That What They Always Do With The Dems Me. Jun 2019 #52

And what assurances do you have from McConnell and Trump katiewritescode Jun 2019 #85

What is your alternative to legislation to help those kids? Still waiting for an answer to that... ehrnst Jul 2019 #109

The alternative would be to not cave and strip out the amendments katiewritescode Jul 2019 #116

Not passing any bill is not an alternative to legislation that helps those kids ehrnst Jul 2019 #117

I Vote For The Hypnosis Option... Me. Jul 2019 #122

Oh, right. Those kids. Keep forgetting that they're the reason for this, not giving ehrnst Jul 2019 #123

Got nothing? ehrnst Jul 2019 #127

So wait and "don't fight" until 2020 to "run on them being obstructionists." ehrnst Jun 2019 #46

This message was self-deleted by its author ehrnst Jun 2019 #79

How would such an ad campaign get rid of RW talk radio? onenote Jun 2019 #28

It wouldn't. CrispyQ Jun 2019 #56

+1000. (nt) ehrnst Jun 2019 #27

You think that Pelosi should act like the Tea Partiers, and let those kids suffer more ehrnst Jun 2019 #32

Pft. I have no idea where you got that from my post but whatever. CrispyQ Jun 2019 #61

Mea culpa. My mistake. ehrnst Jun 2019 #62

No problem. CrispyQ Jun 2019 #64

"If THEY had been a strong & outspoken opposition party the past 45 years..." lapucelle Jun 2019 #51

Referring to dem leadership, DNC and any other national dem/leftist orgs over the years. CrispyQ Jun 2019 #53

"If THEY had been a strong and outspoken opposition PARTY..." lapucelle Jun 2019 #65

Good point. (nt) ehrnst Jun 2019 #68

I'm a Pelosi fan from way back. cwydro Jul 2019 #119

You're Entitled Me. Jul 2019 #121

If this president is not enough for her to start an impeachment inquiry - cwydro Jul 2019 #124

Honestly Me. Jul 2019 #125

Why we need a strong progressive leader like Bernie in the White House who is not afraid InAbLuEsTaTe Jun 2019 #13

So where was he when the vote went to the Senate? ehrnst Jun 2019 #30

I'm tired of "Democrats" complaining about other Democrats not voting with the party... George II Jun 2019 #36

What Ehrnst said EffieBlack Jun 2019 #97

Crickets from the Sanders fans redstateblues Jun 2019 #103

Bam! cwydro Jul 2019 #120

Crickets... ehrnst Jul 2019 #112

More crickets... ehrnst Jul 2019 #118

+1 ck4829 Jun 2019 #14

They didn't "get rid of...." them, they never had them. Anyone who voted against that bill.... George II Jun 2019 #20

Excellent Point Me. Jun 2019 #24

Indeed. I'm hearing lots of familiar GOP-sounding talking points about the social safety net... ehrnst Jul 2019 #113

And what was the alternative? ehrnst Jun 2019 #33

It's like that silly Wayfare walkout last week. It's sad that some people who claim to be worried.. George II Jun 2019 #37

I given them money so they don't spend it on taking care of the kids? uponit7771 Jun 2019 #87

What does that mean? ehrnst Jun 2019 #93

Post removed Post removed Jun 2019 #10

Really? Me. Jun 2019 #12

Indeed ck4829 Jun 2019 #15

from what I've heard KayF Jun 2019 #17

That Is My Impression Too Me. Jun 2019 #18

+1, some how this got or if the Senate without a fight uponit7771 Jun 2019 #88

Bingo. shanny Jul 2019 #126

I see little advantage to calling fellow democrats names. Tech Jun 2019 #22

Agree Me. Jun 2019 #25

Some seem to forget who is on the wrong side of history, and who is on the right side. (nt) ehrnst Jun 2019 #70

That's unfortunate. That word is loaded, and a lot of people won't look beyond that. Iggo Jun 2019 #31

What was the alternative? (nt) ehrnst Jun 2019 #34

To...? Iggo Jun 2019 #57

To what Pelosi did. ehrnst Jun 2019 #58

How does this help? Iggo Jun 2019 #66

Not going to answer the question? (nt) ehrnst Jun 2019 #67

You, either? Iggo Jun 2019 #95

I asked you a question, and you evaded it. ehrnst Jul 2019 #107

No longer recognizing McConnell as a legitimate leader of the Senate? ck4829 Jul 2019 #108

What does it con-notate? ConnorMarc Jun 2019 #54

So do I. Iggo Jun 2019 #59

I am deeply sorry that you do now know what .."Appeasers" means. Or what it con-notate.. Stuart G Jun 2019 #72

So a policy of appeasement is something that can ONLY Crunchy Frog Jun 2019 #94

It's Because That Begining Of THe Usage Was A Very Singluar Event Me. Jun 2019 #96

The meaning of the term is not limited to that singular event Crunchy Frog Jun 2019 #98

Nonsense Me. Jun 2019 #100

I really hope she draws a strong primary challenger. tritsofme Jun 2019 #35

She Certainly RobinA Jun 2019 #99

Certainly Not If She Wants To Work In Accord With Her Colleagues Me. Jun 2019 #101

Is there a hint of anti-Muslim sentiment in your posts? ConnorMarc Jun 2019 #102

Because what other reason could someone oppose your demigod? tritsofme Jul 2019 #104

+1 ck4829 Jul 2019 #106

Here is the video- Judge for yourselves- tulipsandroses Jun 2019 #38

You Actually Did Not Hear Her Call The Members Of The House Appeasers? Me. Jun 2019 #42

I've already said what I said - Others can watch the video and judge for themselves tulipsandroses Jun 2019 #43

So you're going to avoid answering the question? ehrnst Jun 2019 #60

Watch it CC... lapucelle Jun 2019 #63

There you have it! sheshe2 Jun 2019 #77

She uses the expression again later in her segment. lapucelle Jun 2019 #80

Nice Work Me. Jun 2019 #81

And Let's Not Forget Joy Me. Jun 2019 #89

I have stopped watching her, Me. sheshe2 Jun 2019 #90

I'm On The Edge With Her Me. Jun 2019 #91

Rep. Omar is totally wrong..We are not "Appeasers". Stuart G Jun 2019 #69

+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ Me. Jun 2019 #83

When it comes to kids being incarcerated, debating the conditions of incarceration is a pretty good WhiskeyGrinder Jun 2019 #71

You debate, when you can debate..If you read the news, some Congress Members are Stuart G Jun 2019 #73

We know what the conditions are, and they know they're not going to be allowed in. WhiskeyGrinder Jun 2019 #84

Did anyone on the show mention the Republicans mcar Jun 2019 #75

I'm Not Sure About The SEnate DEms Me. Jun 2019 #82

Rep Omar should be ashamed of herself Cha Jul 2019 #105

Now That's Interesting Me. Jul 2019 #114

Yeah.. I'm not impressed Cha Jul 2019 #115

Thank you for standing for me, Rep. Omar! RandiFan1290 Jul 2019 #110

Yes! ck4829 Jul 2019 #111