Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

KY_EnviroGuy

(14,792 posts)
81. Seems to be a trend these days...
Mon Jul 8, 2019, 08:24 AM
Jul 2019

for most people I know to instantly stick their face in their cell phone to search for answers to everything, which is a dangerous trend because few of them verify their sources. There's an assumption that if it's on that phone or tablet screen, it must be right. Most people now are impatient and want instant gratification.

Print media always had somewhat of an assumed authenticity because if people went to all that trouble to write and physically print something, it probably went through editors and proof-readers and they were called out by the public for errors. But now, anyone can publish anything on-line without any responsibility or accountability.

--------------

I think what we're seeing with our newer members of Congress is the annoyance that their ideas are not reaching the public's ears but instead are only heard in committee discussions and often only behind closed doors. Previously, perhaps that was just accepted and they went along with the majority and shut up out of fear or respect.

Social media has allowed them a limited means to prevent that from happening, and I think it's healthy for the public to at least be knowledgeable of their thinking. Members with attractive personalities, dialog and appearance such as AOC seem to be most effective for that purpose. However, just having a bunch of newer members posting randomly to gain attention is not a logical or effective method. And, the quiet, less attractive guy that has the best idea probably won't be heard!

Why not somehow open some of these discussions on specific issues between older and younger members to the public in a casual but respectful format somewhere away from the halls of Congress, like a moderated round table on TV and/or YouTube? That would be far better than various members throwing tit-for-tat posts at each other on Twitter. Heck, they could even allow a time slot for call-in questions from the public.

KY (needed to vent, lol).......

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

I think some people refuse to accept the fact that we can't wasupaloopa Jul 2019 #1
They know. It is called grandstanding. Full of sound and fury, signiying nothing still_one Jul 2019 #2
The PUBLIC needs to educated. pangaia Jul 2019 #4
if m$m requires "flares" to cover ... Hermit-The-Prog Jul 2019 #11
How do you suggest House Members educate the public? StarfishSaver Jul 2019 #15
We could probably start with a refresher course in basic civics 101. sheshe2 Jul 2019 #25
But how will that be disseminated? StarfishSaver Jul 2019 #26
Leaflets dropped from Revolutionary War aircraft! KY_EnviroGuy Jul 2019 #51
Haha StarfishSaver Jul 2019 #54
Seems to be a trend these days... KY_EnviroGuy Jul 2019 #81
I want celebrities like Kim Kardashian (112 million Instagram followers) to help make political betsuni Jul 2019 #68
No clue really. sheshe2 Jul 2019 #55
That's my concern, too StarfishSaver Jul 2019 #56
Someone here said FU Mr President. sheshe2 Jul 2019 #61
Good idea.. must be one of the reasons reagan went after public schools.. pangaia Jul 2019 #70
This message was self-deleted by its author uponit7771 Jul 2019 #79
Here is the thing about being part of a team MichMan Jul 2019 #3
Sounds like censorship to me. They have a right to speak their hearts and minds. notdarkyet Jul 2019 #17
NoBody Said They Couldn't Speak Me. Jul 2019 #22
This! Phoenix61 Jul 2019 #29
... Me. Jul 2019 #65
but if you have so little faith in the organization's processes DBoon Jul 2019 #59
These women have an understanding of this issue that Pelosi doesn't have. Autumn Jul 2019 #5
How so? sheshe2 Jul 2019 #7
In matters of class and cultural identity? Grasswire2 Jul 2019 #21
Perhaps. sheshe2 Jul 2019 #37
Yep , Pelosi got played again. bahrbearian Jul 2019 #10
Nancy got played again? sheshe2 Jul 2019 #19
its ok its ok... it's 3d chess doncha know Locrian Jul 2019 #30
Wow, I didn't hear that one, She forgot to say please. bahrbearian Jul 2019 #35
What understanding do they have that Nancy Pelosi doesn't have? George II Jul 2019 #24
You should try reading the OP and not just responding to my post. Autumn Jul 2019 #31
I did, as well as the first one on this subject posted this afternoon. George II Jul 2019 #36
Then you already knew what understanding of this issue they have that that Pelosi doesn't have Autumn Jul 2019 #41
No, I know that they have a different perspective of this issue, but not necessarily... George II Jul 2019 #44
Here, here. Bravo. triron Jul 2019 #38
But they have a lot to learn about the legislative process bottomofthehill Jul 2019 #42
Precisely. Having "principles" and getting things accomplished are two entirely different things. George II Jul 2019 #45
Unfortunately bottomofthehill Jul 2019 #46
Gaslighting mcar Jul 2019 #6
Love your sig line, melman. sheshe2 Jul 2019 #8
That's nice melman Jul 2019 #9
... sheshe2 Jul 2019 #14
Patty Perfects are just so tedious. nt DURHAM D Jul 2019 #12
Odd that the excerpt above doesn't include Pelosi's comment. Grasswire2 Jul 2019 #13
Right? Me. Jul 2019 #18
Some people can't handle the truth still_one Jul 2019 #23
... Me. Jul 2019 #64
I don't find that odd, I find it intentional. George II Jul 2019 #47
So The Rest Of THe Dem Caucus & The Speaker Aren't Reflective Of The Country Me. Jul 2019 #16
You go girls ... GeorgeGist Jul 2019 #20
Yes, we know. ismnotwasm Jul 2019 #27
Pelosi's statement was extremely arrogant BeyondGeography Jul 2019 #28
Post removed Post removed Jul 2019 #32
Clearly needs to go. We need a Speaker with no clue how the Legislative process works bottomofthehill Jul 2019 #43
Get yourself elected to the House, get a majority of other Democrats to back you up.... George II Jul 2019 #48
'that was supported by the leadership and most Democrats' this is not true, leadership was spit and Celerity Jul 2019 #33
How horrible. Autumn Jul 2019 #34
structurally, due to decades of voter suppression and RW gerrymandering, the only way Celerity Jul 2019 #57
The Problem Solvers Caucus were the ones who went after Nancy if I'm remembering it right? Autumn Jul 2019 #71
Yes, with some overlap from some members of the other 2 caucuses. Celerity Jul 2019 #73
Good post , thanks bahrbearian Jul 2019 #40
The final vote: George II Jul 2019 #49
We have 235 members in our caucus, only 152 voted yea for final passage (170 Rethugs voted yea) Celerity Jul 2019 #62
Eleven didn't vote for various reasons, they weren't "defections"... George II Jul 2019 #66
if you read my posts I said that the majority or close to it, in our caucus is now in one of the 3 Celerity Jul 2019 #72
your numbers were wrong, btw, and, as usual, I provide links. If you have a link to challenge Celerity Jul 2019 #82
My numbers are correct, as usual. Anyone who is really interested in actual vote tallies.... George II Jul 2019 #83
that was NOT the final vote, as I showed, you are simply wrong Celerity Jul 2019 #84
Thank you for posting that DeminPennswoods Jul 2019 #50
yes she did, and I am puzzled why she is now pro-actively having a go at many who supported Celerity Jul 2019 #67
So the solution is to pass a bill in the House bottomofthehill Jul 2019 #39
Got bad news for you infinite_wisdom Jul 2019 #53
I think I pretty much agree with you bottomofthehill Jul 2019 #60
Things could happen infinite_wisdom Jul 2019 #75
Little hope but hope. bottomofthehill Jul 2019 #63
Short term there is a pretty good chance infinite_wisdom Jul 2019 #76
a fairly complete rundown of possible R to D Senate flips Celerity Jul 2019 #78
Brian Fallon: the four show great moral leadership. EndGOPPropaganda Jul 2019 #52
well that's interesting..... Grasswire2 Jul 2019 #58
Here's more on Fallon's "self-radicalization" EndGOPPropaganda Jul 2019 #80
This message was self-deleted by its author LovingA2andMI Jul 2019 #74
Post removed Post removed Jul 2019 #69
Pelosi never does this in public. shanny Jul 2019 #77
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Tensions flare over Pelos...»Reply #81