Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Nancy Pelosi just played Donald Trump and the House GOP like a fiddle [View all]StarfishSaver
(18,486 posts)33. A "racism vote" won't end with an acquittal in the Senate and an end to investigations
But I do love watching people who've been demanding that the House MUST impeach NOW even if it won't remove him from office because they must make a STATEMENT about his corruption respond to the House making a statement about Trump's racism by shrugging their shoulders and muttering "Meh! It's not going to change anything, so it's a waste of time ..."
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
171 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
So... please be remember this, how she stood up to dotard, and for her members.
Thekaspervote
Jul 2019
#1
This wasn't about taking Trump down. This was about standing up for her caucus
StarfishSaver
Jul 2019
#94
Here is what Trump could argue if we impeached (and of course the Senate voted down):
Chemisse
Jul 2019
#120
This whole thread is full of smart analysis. Can't disagree with this assessment.
joost5
Jul 2019
#158
Why would it put a halt into the investigations? On the contrary, it would open the vaults
Perseus
Jul 2019
#114
Please read starfishsaver's post #77, just below yours. This is correct. it won't rid us of him
Thekaspervote
Jul 2019
#81
You have no idea what's going on. This is for the record: rule of law vs scofflaw; party vs party.
ancianita
Jul 2019
#60
Thanks, ancianita, for your perceptive and intelligent post. I'm tired of the Pelosi pot- shotters.
NBachers
Jul 2019
#68
Yes thank you.. me too sick and tired of arm chair politicians snarking at Speaker Pelosi
Thekaspervote
Jul 2019
#84
Absolutely no need? What kind of 2020 turnout are you imagining. I'm seeing people who aren't
ancianita
Jul 2019
#97
You think the Speaker taking the rare step of censuring a president because of racist comments he
StarfishSaver
Jul 2019
#99
It wasn't a censuring....it was a resolution to condem the tweets & comments
AncientGeezer
Jul 2019
#166
No so not worth losing the house...and having the dotard win a second term...when he will stay after
Demsrule86
Jul 2019
#22
She won't lose the House any more with an impeachment vote than she did today with a racism vote.
Goodheart
Jul 2019
#24
A "racism vote" won't end with an acquittal in the Senate and an end to investigations
StarfishSaver
Jul 2019
#33
Agree! madam speaker stood up to racism and publicly supported her members.
Thekaspervote
Jul 2019
#85
Impeachment isn't popular and those who believe that magically, the country will wake up and support
Demsrule86
Jul 2019
#135
That is not true...impeachment is not popular and we are too close to an election...you might feel
Demsrule86
Jul 2019
#132
Exactly...people need to consider the political implications of impeaching Trump...and they could
Demsrule86
Jul 2019
#133
Moderates gave us the house...in their districts...impeachment is not popular period...Impeaching
Demsrule86
Jul 2019
#131
People on the left cost us 2010...there was no way to get a single payer or a public option and
Demsrule86
Jul 2019
#162
The Speaker doesn't need to create a "learning moment" for herself. She knows what she's doing
StarfishSaver
Jul 2019
#28
StarfishSaver, you've turned into one of the posters I rely on for well-informed perspective.
NBachers
Jul 2019
#69
That's hysterical, and to think it was produced 8 years ago, before things got MUCH worse.
George II
Jul 2019
#121
Unless I missed it he's been MIGHTY quiet ever since the vote. Steaming I suspect.
George II
Jul 2019
#25
I think this fell just short of censure, but historically they are not too different....
George II
Jul 2019
#48
GOP, what countries do you want the four democrat Congresswomen to return to?
keithbvadu2
Jul 2019
#30
I'm not against the resolution obviously but I hope people don't think of this as some end
SweetieD
Jul 2019
#35
the western border of WA-3 (the ocean) is the only Rethug-held part of the entire Pacific Coast
Celerity
Jul 2019
#40
thanks for the background, and I would have assumed that Vancouver, due to being right across the
Celerity
Jul 2019
#71
Perhaps even more powerful than the actual vote was the vote against the republicans...
George II
Jul 2019
#56
Why do you think this resolution is worthless but impeachment without removal
StarfishSaver
Jul 2019
#65
Impeachment without conviction has no more legal ramifications than a resolution
StarfishSaver
Jul 2019
#76
It makes all the difference. Today is about what mcar's post said. I'll add what I told angrychair.
ancianita
Jul 2019
#70
Thank you!! Great voice, great reasoning.. maybe you should run for office!!
Thekaspervote
Jul 2019
#91
No politician who gets into Twitter feuds with their own party members is "brilliant."
MadDAsHell
Jul 2019
#74
That's great. I gave the dotard my middle finger today and called the repukes racists.
58Sunliner
Jul 2019
#87
No... you are not playing chess ..yet. Speaker Pelosi is playing the long game. You cannot
Thekaspervote
Jul 2019
#93