Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

calimary

(81,261 posts)
12. Must have been an avalanche if they felt compelled to mention it.
Thu Aug 30, 2012, 12:24 AM
Aug 2012

Wonder if they're finally realizing that at least some of us are keeping track?

And maybe they're looking at all those emails and extrapolating out what they might mean, numerically. And believe me, those numbers talk. Loudly. When I was in radio, even a SINGLE comment on the request line was carefully noted. Listener guidance and feedback mattered a lot. Depending on the size of the market, one request on the request line might be representative of at least ten, or maybe 100, or a thousand, or more - sometimes MUCH more. The idea being - if ONE person calls in, that means there's at least X number more people who feel the same way, only they're too busy to call in, or they forget to, or they think it doesn't make any difference so why bother.

I haven't told this story in a long time and there are quite a few new folks here, so let me offer this personal testament. I worked at a big station where program directors were changed almost as often as underwear. That always made for lots of firings. VERY unstable time at that place. Since it was a rock station, my part of the on-air presentation (morning and noon news breaks) wasn't exactly regarded as essential programming. And anything considered non-essential was usually not long for this world.

Arbitron was the main ratings service at that time (back in the late 70s - way before the People Meters and such). People would fill out "diaries" of their listening preferences, on paper by hand, regarding when and for how long, for a given time frame. Arbitron had this extra service called the "ARB Talkback," in which it wasn't simply about numbers of listeners but what they SAID in those "diaries." There was room for comment. In this particular "book," somebody wrote a comment saying "entertaining morning news with 'calimary'." The people who got these "diaries" to fill out were random people, completely anonymous, and nobody anyone knew or could be put up to it. There wasn't any way to cheat. I have no idea who wrote that comment, but when the station got all these stats, these sheets always got passed around all over the building within minutes, and everybody soon knew that - out of all the dayparts and well-known jocks and slogans and jingles and playing the hits, it was their little morning news-chick who'd been singled out, by name, for praise in the all-important holier-than-holy "ARB Talkback" this time.

It was ONE mention. And that ONE mention saved my job for a year.

k&r nt steve2470 Aug 2012 #1
good proud patriot Aug 2012 #2
pretty damned disgusting that a supposed "NEWS" organization has to be told by its audience niyad Aug 2012 #3
CNN stopped doing real reporting soon after the 2000 elecion. R. Daneel Olivaw Aug 2012 #7
YEE--AH! That would make a Great Tweet and Cha Aug 2012 #11
anybody on twitter or whatever is free to use it. niyad Aug 2012 #13
Must have been an avalanche if they felt compelled to mention it. calimary Aug 2012 #12
You are a treasure, calimary. DocMac Aug 2012 #25
I think that's worth a thread of its own renate Aug 2012 #30
Great post malaise Aug 2012 #33
I was looking at twitter earlier and the Ryan backlash was strong, so I bet they are getting swamped anneboleyn Aug 2012 #57
Sad to say for the most part these days members of the media are pretty damned lazy. Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin Aug 2012 #17
Well considering the same "News" organization.... LovingA2andMI Aug 2012 #19
Exactly. n/t Summer Hathaway Aug 2012 #26
Maybe they should try reporting them. Walk away Aug 2012 #4
That's funny, cause I have not heard a peep ON AIR about his lies. tjdee Aug 2012 #5
Try MSNBC. elleng Aug 2012 #23
Lol lightcameron Aug 2012 #37
??? elleng Aug 2012 #53
it's one that Lex Aug 2012 #60
Got it. Thanks. elleng Aug 2012 #61
They were talking about the lies right after the speech. That's what got lightcameron Aug 2012 #36
MSNBC is not the liberal equivalent of Faux--no way ailsagirl Aug 2012 #45
Right. lightcameron Aug 2012 #49
you're totally full of shit: I watched a ten minute segment on msnbc last Gabi Hayes Aug 2012 #54
Thank you, Gabi ailsagirl Aug 2012 #59
they can't call it lies, 1+1=2 is just an opinion from one side JI7 Aug 2012 #6
Yes, unfortunately that is exactly how "reporting" is done these days. /nt Dragonfli Aug 2012 #14
Once again the media fails to do its job. Since when is telling the truth a bad thing? altehomme Aug 2012 #52
WOWOWOWOWOW...Admitting getting email And Cha Aug 2012 #8
Reluctantly. Quantess Aug 2012 #9
Go Twitter!! AsahinaKimi Aug 2012 #10
#janesville is trending - that has to be a good thing, right? reformist2 Aug 2012 #15
yes, wow Walker pissed people off nt flamingdem Aug 2012 #21
OK DUers, our turn!!! Sending mine off after this post! nt nanabugg Aug 2012 #16
... Fire Walk With Me Aug 2012 #22
Well if they'd start debunking them davidpdx Aug 2012 #18
why reluctantly? I swear something is fishy with the cable networks liberal_at_heart Aug 2012 #20
Not MSNBC, it appears. elleng Aug 2012 #24
K/R Window Aug 2012 #27
OK, they have the e-mails. I looked on CNN on-line - nothing hollysmom Aug 2012 #28
That's why Dems/Progressives have to stay on their case. Under sufficient pressure... SIDURI Aug 2012 #29
I couldn't agree more--it is such a serious problem renate Aug 2012 #31
Thank you for the welcome! SIDURI Aug 2012 #34
Decent Americans are pretty damn sick of corporate media letting Republican lies pass Berlum Aug 2012 #32
Uh, they were talking about the lies immediately following the speech. lightcameron Aug 2012 #35
Ryan was telling lies after the speech too? Lex Aug 2012 #38
Good try, sport. lightcameron Aug 2012 #39
"Sport?" Lex Aug 2012 #40
103. lightcameron Aug 2012 #41
Are you disputing that Ryan told lies during his speech last night? Lex Aug 2012 #42
calm down Lex CatWoman Aug 2012 #43
thanks . . . Lex Aug 2012 #48
Lol. Read this very slowly, okay? lightcameron Aug 2012 #44
Yeah, okay. That makes perfect sense. Not. Lex Aug 2012 #47
"Not"? 1991 called... lightcameron Aug 2012 #50
How many emails equals a ton? Missycim Aug 2012 #46
K&R !!! n/t RKP5637 Aug 2012 #51
they got those emails because they praised his speech with 'only' 7 or 8 factual errors(?!) Bill USA Aug 2012 #55
that's it for me. time for something to lower the BP Gabi Hayes Aug 2012 #56
He is being called "Lyin Ryan" on Twitter. There were a gazillion tweets about the GM plant lie. anneboleyn Aug 2012 #58
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»"CNN anchors reporti...»Reply #12