General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: The Case of Al Franken by Jane Mayer [View all]Trumpocalypse
(6,143 posts)It does discuss Gillibrand's actions but never says that she was the leader who forced anyone else's hand. And frankly, there are so many factual errors and omissions in that article, it is hard to take seriously. Gillibrand is one of 38 senators who called on Franken to resign on the very same day, most within minutes. But like most of the media, and Franken cultist, the author only focuses on Gillibrand and ignores everyone else.
So your accusations of her motives have no factual support. I'm not a mind reader and you are not one either. I don't pretend to know anyone's motivations for their actions. So how do you know what Gillibrand's motives are? Are you a mind reader?
As liberals/progressives we shouldn't be in the business of demonizing someone, especially a Democratic elected official, without any credible evidence. That is what the right does and we should be ashamed to play that slimy game too.