General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: The Case of Al Franken by Jane Mayer [View all]LiberalLovinLug
(14,548 posts)Whatever. She was the first and only one to call Franken's staff, or rather her surrogates called, to inform him that she was GOING TO publicly call for his resignation, no ifs ands or buts(!).
"Gillibrands staff alerted Franken that she would be demanding his resignation"
Was there someone else that you know of that was the first? The "lead" person?
I'm sure she called ahead to her peers as well to get support, and promises to back her up, but it was her that got the ball rolling. Who knows if any other rep would have jumped in as the "initiator" to publicly demand his resignation with no appeal, if she hadn't.
Anyways, obviously this is just my opinion, but its based on all the facts and timelines, and circumstantial evidence I see. You come to different conclusions. I don't quite know what those are other than to blindly support Gillibrand's rush to judgment. Do you think Al Franken is a dangerous sex offender? Do you think he's a threat to interns? You obviously agree with Gillibrand that he is unfit for office. That he's unforgivable. Or is it something else? You haven't spoken much on that.