General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: The Case of Al Franken by Jane Mayer [View all]Trumpocalypse
(6,143 posts)And no one knows what went on behind the scenes. The author only focuses on Gillibrand's actions that day it say nothing about the other Senators who also called on him to resign that day. In fact based on that article only Gillibrand had her office call Franken's office to inform him, none of the other Senators did so. But that is the problem with that article, there are numerous factual errors and omissions.
If you want a timeline, I suggest you look at this:
https://qz.com/1148972/al-franken-all-of-the-senators-calling-for-his-resignation/
As shown Gillibrand may have been first but only by a few minutes. And there are no other fact to support any other conclusion beyond that.
All opinions should be at least based on facts, not by bias. My point is there are not enough facts to single Gillibrand out and give a pass to every other Senator who called for his resignation. That is just unfair. Something I thought liberals/progressives didn't do.