Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Nate Silver is way off base here [View all]Celerity
(54,427 posts)24. An Antidote to Donald Trump's Secrecy on Taxes (Ironically from the NYT, lolol)
https://www.nytimes.com/2016/12/12/opinion/an-antidote-to-donald-trumps-secrecy-on-taxes.html
President-elect Donald Trump refused to release his tax returns during the campaign and there is no sign that he will, ever. He broke longstanding tradition and set a terrible precedent for future presidential candidates.
Good government groups have been wringing their hands about what to do. Now comes an excellent idea from a New York State senator, Brad Hoylman, a Democrat from Manhattan, that would force candidates to disclose their tax returns by making it a requirement for getting on the ballot. Mr. Hoylman says that he plans to introduce a bill that would require presidential and vice-presidential candidates to disclose up to five years of their tax returns 50 days before the general election. The states Board of Elections would publish the returns on its website.
Candidates who fail to provide the documents would not appear on the state ballot and the states Electoral College electors could not vote for them. This is a smart proposal not just for New York but for other states as well. Even if a handful of states imposed the requirement, all major party nominees would have to disclose their tax returns.
Mr. Trump might well challenge such a law if he seeks a second term and wants to continue hiding his tax returns. As drafted, the bill should withstand constitutional scrutiny, said Laurence Tribe, a constitutional law scholar at Harvard. Ballot access requirements vary significantly from state to state, and it seems that N.Y. might be able to simply add tax disclosure as a procedural ballot access requirement, he wrote in an email.
snip
President-elect Donald Trump refused to release his tax returns during the campaign and there is no sign that he will, ever. He broke longstanding tradition and set a terrible precedent for future presidential candidates.
Good government groups have been wringing their hands about what to do. Now comes an excellent idea from a New York State senator, Brad Hoylman, a Democrat from Manhattan, that would force candidates to disclose their tax returns by making it a requirement for getting on the ballot. Mr. Hoylman says that he plans to introduce a bill that would require presidential and vice-presidential candidates to disclose up to five years of their tax returns 50 days before the general election. The states Board of Elections would publish the returns on its website.
Candidates who fail to provide the documents would not appear on the state ballot and the states Electoral College electors could not vote for them. This is a smart proposal not just for New York but for other states as well. Even if a handful of states imposed the requirement, all major party nominees would have to disclose their tax returns.
Mr. Trump might well challenge such a law if he seeks a second term and wants to continue hiding his tax returns. As drafted, the bill should withstand constitutional scrutiny, said Laurence Tribe, a constitutional law scholar at Harvard. Ballot access requirements vary significantly from state to state, and it seems that N.Y. might be able to simply add tax disclosure as a procedural ballot access requirement, he wrote in an email.
snip
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
70 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
So you think he won't enter and cough up the taxes? Calif. is doing it to get the info out.
brush
Jul 2019
#31
The state is doing it to get the info out. Only possible backfire is if the taxes are clean.
brush
Jul 2019
#33
This is only for the primary, not the GE. Not even sure if the Ca SC will allow this for the
still_one
Jul 2019
#6
I'd be ok if it's required of everyone... like what my kids had to submit to get their 1st driver's
deurbano
Jul 2019
#64
Most states have ballot access laws that set forth specific requirements candidates must meet
StarfishSaver
Jul 2019
#22
An Antidote to Donald Trump's Secrecy on Taxes (Ironically from the NYT, lolol)
Celerity
Jul 2019
#24
What's "undemocratic" about it? Candidates of all parties have to abide the same rules.
Goodheart
Jul 2019
#26
I have never found Nate to be a fount of wisdom no matter how popular his opinions are with some.
Ford_Prefect
Jul 2019
#30
Does this also require tax returns for all state and local candidates as well ?
MichMan
Jul 2019
#36
I like this...my concern is that this next election is going to be held up in courts
C Moon
Jul 2019
#45
Actually, many states have ballot access requirements that mandate candidates do certain things
StarfishSaver
Jul 2019
#53
Agreed - plus, I'm not sure a state can unilaterally force someone to waive their federal
Midwestern Democrat
Jul 2019
#61
KGB is already in our systems, gotta vote still but mass chaos and war coming which is
Eliot Rosewater
Jul 2019
#52