Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Caliman73

(11,767 posts)
21. Never said that. No one did.
Wed Jul 31, 2019, 11:47 AM
Jul 2019

The whole point to both posts was that Dershowitz is trying to use loophole language to evade telling the truth. Clinton used technical terminology to cover the fact that he had a sexual relationship with Lewinsky.

Of course the acts alleged are nothing alike.

My response is that we have the objectivity to know when our leaders, and people we like, do things that are not okay.


Perhaps I was wrong about that...

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

a clintonesque answer Demonaut Jul 2019 #1
It's okay if it IS a knock... Caliman73 Jul 2019 #16
what Clinton did does not belong with the epstein case JI7 Jul 2019 #18
Never said that. No one did. Caliman73 Jul 2019 #21
Good catch. 50 Shades Of Blue Jul 2019 #2
Agreed! nt ecstatic Jul 2019 #7
Has evidence emerged to charge Dersh with underage sex activity? at140 Jul 2019 #3
He's the one throwing out a defense without even being charged leftstreet Jul 2019 #6
That is a good point! at140 Jul 2019 #8
How much evidence do you need? nt pnwmom Jul 2019 #10
Examples of evidence... at140 Jul 2019 #12
There won't be any criminal charges because of the statute of limitations. pnwmom Jul 2019 #15
But he can never be proven guilty in criminal court because the statute of limitations expired. pnwmom Jul 2019 #9
Those tapes confiscated at Epstein's house at140 Jul 2019 #11
America won't care about statutes of limitations FakeNoose Jul 2019 #14
"Look, I've had sex with one woman (and a few hundred children) since..." Dennis Donovan Jul 2019 #4
He's a weasel and a lawyer, that statement means nothing without each word being dissected in detail RockRaven Jul 2019 #5
And he's not under oath fescuerescue Jul 2019 #20
ok, then I feel sorry for that one woman mokawanis Jul 2019 #13
Depends on what the meaning of "sex" is. yellowcanine Jul 2019 #17
That's quite a long session for sex? What stamina. BSdetect Jul 2019 #19
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»The Dershowitz loophole: ...»Reply #21