Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Buckeye_Democrat

(15,539 posts)
23. I disagree.
Thu Aug 1, 2019, 12:54 AM
Aug 2019

Last edited Thu Aug 1, 2019, 02:07 AM - Edit history (1)

"It is the government control of the means of production."

I think your definition is too limited.

https://www.britannica.com/topic/socialism

Socialism: Social and economic doctrine that calls for public rather than private ownership or control of property and natural resources.


This fundamental conviction nevertheless leaves room for socialists to disagree among themselves with regard to two key points. The first concerns the extent and the kind of property that society should own or control. Some socialists have thought that almost everything except personal items such as clothing should be public property; this is true, for example, of the society envisioned by the English humanist Sir Thomas More in his Utopia (1516). Other socialists, however, have been willing to accept or even welcome private ownership of farms, shops, and other small or medium-sized businesses.






Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Yes. Social Security/Medicare makes old people lazy! leftstreet Jul 2019 #1
find a job you like and you can do it forever! rampartc Jul 2019 #2
I like all his programs and also those signed in by LBJ like Medicare. GulfCoast66 Jul 2019 #3
What does socialism mean to you? Buckeye_Democrat Jul 2019 #4
That is not what socialism means. GulfCoast66 Jul 2019 #6
Exactly right +++ comradebillyboy Jul 2019 #7
Great post, Gulf Coast Poiuyt Jul 2019 #11
Sorry I trust Chomsky more than you ChubbyStar Jul 2019 #16
I never asked you to trust me. Hell, you don't even know me! GulfCoast66 Jul 2019 #17
I disagree. Buckeye_Democrat Aug 2019 #23
Precisely JHB Aug 2019 #25
Socialism is not government control of production. flaval Aug 2019 #26
That's a difference with no distinction... GulfCoast66 Aug 2019 #27
The National Recovery Administration was terribly anti-competitive Jose Garcia Jul 2019 #5
Some would say that FDR Trumpocalypse Jul 2019 #8
Agree with your first 2 criticism. But not the third. GulfCoast66 Jul 2019 #12
FDR built the military industrial complex Trumpocalypse Aug 2019 #18
Well, he had a global war against Nazis and imperial Japan to win... GulfCoast66 Aug 2019 #19
Not saying that Trumpocalypse Aug 2019 #20
And the alternative? Losing the war. GulfCoast66 Aug 2019 #21
Not the point Trumpocalypse Aug 2019 #22
FDR's economic policies were probably too racist for most people here Spider Jerusalem Jul 2019 #9
Yeah. True. But he had to have the southern democrats. GulfCoast66 Jul 2019 #13
not for this guy and onethatcares Jul 2019 #10
Without Social Security Retirement we would be in serious financial trouble. trof Jul 2019 #14
FDR saved capitalism Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin Jul 2019 #15
Ironically, he was excoriated as a corporatist and sell-out by the socialists and populists Recursion Aug 2019 #24
Right. It astounds me that so many on the left push this idea. GulfCoast66 Aug 2019 #28
FDR left large swaths of the country's population out of his policies. Blue_true Aug 2019 #29
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Were FDR's economic polic...»Reply #23