Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Help me out with weapon terminology please [View all]Hermit-The-Prog
(36,631 posts)39. ignore the terminology
You plainly state your intent; that's good enough.
If you focus on the terminology, manufacturers will work around it with new marketing and lobbying.
If you focus on the purpose (goal), then a law can be drafted to accomplish that goal regardless of changing terminology or marketing.
For example, you could say that no weapon capable of delivering deadly or injurious projectiles, or other deadly or injurious force, at a rate of more than 3 such deliveries per minute, may be sold to, owned by, or kept in possession of, citizens without law enforcement or military training, licensing and responsibility.
Let the battle then begin.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
51 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
So I carried an M16A1 in Vietnam. The fact that someone can carry something similar in El Paso
wasupaloopa
Aug 2019
#31
Magazine because it contains the springs to push rounds up and can be changed out.
NutmegYankee
Aug 2019
#6
I prefer to just say, "Look gun-humper, they both feed bullets into the chamber so you can kill
Hoyt
Aug 2019
#9
NRA babbling points. You must be able to identify an AR-15 hammer spring blind folded
brewens
Aug 2019
#11
They say we can't just call them assault rifles because technically, these days those are
brewens
Aug 2019
#45
Generally if you are pushing legislation it is helpful to know what you are talking about-ymmv
EX500rider
Aug 2019
#15
As useful as it is to short-circuit their objection by just using the correct term from the start,
RockRaven
Aug 2019
#16