Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: The Great Need for Impeachment of Donald J. Trump [View all]StarfishSaver
(18,486 posts)27. I think you may have misread the explanation
He didn't say he didn't ask for them because he would be accused of playing politics. He said that asking for the New York returns would undermine the justification of the committee has given for asking for the federal returns. The justification given for getting the Federal returns is oversight of the IRS. The state tax returns do not advance that purpose and, therefore asking for them would bolster Trump's claim that the committee request has nothing to do with oversight but was simply on a political fishing expedition.
Neal has said he fears that getting the state returns would bolster Trump administration arguments that Congress is on a political fishing expedition -- and not, as Neal has claimed, overseeing the Internal Revenue Services annual audits of the president.
Neal has crafted his requests to Mnuchin by citing the need for the Ways and Means Committee to oversee the IRSs annual audits of the president. He fears that seeking the state returns will weaken that argument.
We dont have jurisdiction over New York taxes, Neal said.
https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2019-06-05/trump-tax-fight-sows-discord-between-wary-and-warlike-democrats
Neal has crafted his requests to Mnuchin by citing the need for the Ways and Means Committee to oversee the IRSs annual audits of the president. He fears that seeking the state returns will weaken that argument.
We dont have jurisdiction over New York taxes, Neal said.
https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2019-06-05/trump-tax-fight-sows-discord-between-wary-and-warlike-democrats
And he's right.
Moreover, as I said, they're not going to get the New York returns anytime soon anyway- Trump can tie them up in court for years, especially since this law is untested. They are, however, very likely to get the federal returns soon using the federal law and legal strategy they've mapped out and are, fortunately, sticking to, despite the badgering of people from the sidelines.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
41 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
So we don't even give it our best effort to expose his deeds to the American public?
Time for change
Aug 2019
#3
The lawsuits will be important mainly to the extent that the American public is more exposed to what
Time for change
Aug 2019
#16
From a legal standpoint, taking the 5th may be a safe and reasonable thing to do
Time for change
Aug 2019
#5
Because accepting them would have undermined and likely destroyed his ability
StarfishSaver
Aug 2019
#18
I don't understand the concept of the phrase "overseeing the IRS audits" of the President
Time for change
Aug 2019
#29
I disagree that the House or any of its memebers would be in legal jeopardy for accepting the NY
Time for change
Aug 2019
#35
I understand the law well enough to know that Congress won't be held in legal jeopardy for
Time for change
Aug 2019
#38
Are the Courts dragging their feet on the requests of the House Judiciary Committee?
kentuck
Aug 2019
#37