Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Do you believe corporate media conglomeration to have a positive or negative affect [View all]Dennis Donovan
(31,059 posts)7. Media conglomeration is, IMO, the most dangerous aspect of the 1996 Telecom act...
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Telecommunications_Act_of_1996
The Telecommunications Act of 1996 was the first significant overhaul of telecommunications law in more than sixty years, amending the Communications Act of 1934. The Act, signed by President Bill Clinton, represented a major change in American telecommunication law, since it was the first time that the Internet was included in broadcasting and spectrum allotment.
One of the most controversial titles was Title 3 ("Cable Services"
, which allowed for media cross-ownership. According to the Federal Communications Commission (FCC), the goal of the law was to "let anyone enter any communications business to let any communications business compete in any market against any other." The legislation's primary goal was deregulation of the converging broadcasting and telecommunications markets. However, the law's regulatory policies have been questioned, including the effects of dualistic re-regulation of the communications market.
</snip>
The Telecommunications Act of 1996 was the first significant overhaul of telecommunications law in more than sixty years, amending the Communications Act of 1934. The Act, signed by President Bill Clinton, represented a major change in American telecommunication law, since it was the first time that the Internet was included in broadcasting and spectrum allotment.
One of the most controversial titles was Title 3 ("Cable Services"
</snip>
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
43 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Do you believe corporate media conglomeration to have a positive or negative affect [View all]
Uncle Joe
Aug 2019
OP
Media conglomeration is, IMO, the most dangerous aspect of the 1996 Telecom act...
Dennis Donovan
Aug 2019
#7
I think the real danger is bias confirming niche media, mainly on the internet,
lapucelle
Aug 2019
#2
Precisely TreasonousBastard, but some would argue corporate ownership makes no difference
Uncle Joe
Aug 2019
#9
Even more strawmen, in addition to the three fallacies from the original thread...
ehrnst
Aug 2019
#26
Your "fallacies," "strawmen," attempts at personalizing this and transparent evasion at answering
Uncle Joe
Aug 2019
#31
Logic dictates either you believe FOX "News" has worked to spread racism or it hasn't.
Uncle Joe
Aug 2019
#29
I agree that holding a debate with anyone unwilling to actually answer fundamental questions
Uncle Joe
Aug 2019
#32