Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Do you believe corporate media conglomeration to have a positive or negative affect [View all]Uncle Joe
(65,811 posts)43. Who Owns the Media?
Like all reliable watchdogs, the media are expected to bark, but when its many-faceted voice is owned by a small number of corporate masters, concerns about its willingness to keep barking arise.
The trend of media conglomeration has been steady. In 1983, 50 corporations controlled most of the American media, including magazines, books, music, news feeds, newspapers, movies, radio and television. By 1992 that number had dropped by half. By 2000, six corporations had ownership of most media, and today five dominate the industry: Time Warner, Disney, Murdoch's News Corporation, Bertelsmann of Germany and Viacom. With markets branching rapidly into international territories, these few companies are increasingly responsible for deciding what information is shared around the world.
There are also major news organizations not owned by the big five. The New York Times is owned by the publicly-held New York Times Corporation, The Washington Post is owned by the publicly-held Washington Post Company and The Chicago Tribune and Los Angeles Times are both owned by the Tribune Company. Hearst Publications owns 12 newspapers including the San Francisco Chronicle, as well as magazines, television stations and cable and interactive media.
But even those publications are subject to the conglomerate machine, and many see the corporatizing of media as an alarming trend. Ben Bagdikian, Pulitzer-prize winning journalist, former Dean of the Graduate School of Journalism at UC Berkeley and author of The New Media Monopoly, describes the five media giants as a cartel that wields enough influence to change U.S. politics and define social values.
Internet Ownership
(snip)
https://www.pbs.org/independentlens/democracyondeadline/mediaownership.html
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
43 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Do you believe corporate media conglomeration to have a positive or negative affect [View all]
Uncle Joe
Aug 2019
OP
Media conglomeration is, IMO, the most dangerous aspect of the 1996 Telecom act...
Dennis Donovan
Aug 2019
#7
I think the real danger is bias confirming niche media, mainly on the internet,
lapucelle
Aug 2019
#2
Precisely TreasonousBastard, but some would argue corporate ownership makes no difference
Uncle Joe
Aug 2019
#9
Even more strawmen, in addition to the three fallacies from the original thread...
ehrnst
Aug 2019
#26
Your "fallacies," "strawmen," attempts at personalizing this and transparent evasion at answering
Uncle Joe
Aug 2019
#31
Logic dictates either you believe FOX "News" has worked to spread racism or it hasn't.
Uncle Joe
Aug 2019
#29
I agree that holding a debate with anyone unwilling to actually answer fundamental questions
Uncle Joe
Aug 2019
#32