A court ruling just changed how we pick our president

[hlthe2b]

29. You miss the point that they require (currently) states supplying more than 70 more EC votes.

That will by necessity have to include quite a few red or at least battleground states. Right now, it is non-binding because they have insufficient votes to enact it. Even if one only assumes the whole effort to be a stepping stone to raising awareness and support for a constitutional amendment abolishing the EC, there is value.

One can drum up scenarios for ANY and all possible solutions that could defeat or at least be a loop-hole, no matter how improbable. Constitutional and electoral scholars far more versed on the issues, practicalities, legalities and implications than you or I believe it will work. I won't spend all day countering them or the endless "what-ifs". I may be dead tomorrow. So may you. What if? Honestly, it never stops.