Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

pnwmom

(110,282 posts)
20. That was just what I was thinking, UTUSN. And we know how that turned out.
Wed Aug 28, 2019, 06:52 PM
Aug 2019

They're trying to inoculate Trump from something. I think what probably happened is that the Russians "invested" billions in the private banking side of Deutsche, and then those private bankers lent out millions to Trump.

So the Russians didn't have to officially co-sign. They just gave Deutsche the money they wanted to invest. And told Deutsche where they wanted it to go.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Maybe he should have had credible evidence. dem4decades Aug 2019 #1
No it doesn't. DURHAM D Aug 2019 #2
I'd love to think that's the case, though I fear it's the case of MSNBC lawyers crapping themselves OnDoutside Aug 2019 #3
Did you watch the show last night? nt DURHAM D Aug 2019 #4
Yes I did, and I saw Rachel's show where she did a block on Deutsche Bank. I also saw the handover OnDoutside Aug 2019 #11
He is having fun. DURHAM D Aug 2019 #15
I really hope you are right. OnDoutside Aug 2019 #16
I'm pretty sure NBC Universal has Donnie Small Hands out lawyered. gldstwmn Aug 2019 #26
Message auto-removed Name removed Aug 2019 #43
O'Donnell shouldn't have reported it until it was confirmed StarfishSaver Aug 2019 #5
Did you watch the show last night? nt DURHAM D Aug 2019 #8
Yes, I did StarfishSaver Aug 2019 #9
Seems to me that you are holding Lawrence to a higher standard DURHAM D Aug 2019 #13
You may be. I'm not StarfishSaver Aug 2019 #22
I was surprised Lawrence let his own high standards slip. eShirl Aug 2019 #40
You then believe a story should not be referenced by any media without more than one source? LanternWaste Aug 2019 #36
A story about what's in a document shouldn't be reported without the document or more than 1 source StarfishSaver Aug 2019 #42
I watched the show. The piece about corrupt trump and Russia I wouldn't call journalism. rockfordfile Aug 2019 #37
I feel like L.O. has done this once before. ffr Aug 2019 #6
My money's on Lawrence. nolabear Aug 2019 #7
They want the lawsuit greymattermom Aug 2019 #10
Exactly! Spanky's in way over his head. nolabear Aug 2019 #14
I could be wrong but I think the guarantor has to be gldstwmn Aug 2019 #27
,., Celerity Aug 2019 #19
Yes, I saw that after I posted. I truly hope it's caution. If not I'm pissed at him. nolabear Aug 2019 #23
I hope he has the goods on Rump, I really do not want to give up coming back to Los Angeles Celerity Aug 2019 #25
I believe O'Donnell's story is true as he presented it last nite. triron Aug 2019 #12
Me, too UTUSN Aug 2019 #17
Lawrence made plain how and where he got the report. Kid Berwyn Aug 2019 #18
That was just what I was thinking, UTUSN. And we know how that turned out. pnwmom Aug 2019 #20
May the truth come out soon. lunatica Aug 2019 #21
It's not that its not true. In fact I'm sure it is true gldstwmn Aug 2019 #24
I don't get the "hoping-sue" angle. Or "speculated" - had 1 trusted source UTUSN Aug 2019 #30
He never saw the tax returns. gldstwmn Aug 2019 #32
Who is 'he'? triron Aug 2019 #33
O'Donnell. There was a report that his source gldstwmn Aug 2019 #35
Lawrence might have to take the fall for this just like dan. Joe941 Aug 2019 #28
Seems like he put enough caveats around it Buckeyeblue Aug 2019 #29
He gave a tepid "apology" ConnorMarc Aug 2019 #31
What's your point? triron Aug 2019 #34
I think opening the can of worms might have been brilliant as Ilsa Aug 2019 #38
Been thinking about this for the last day budkin Aug 2019 #39
This will go away by the weekend Trenzalore Aug 2019 #41
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»It smells of a dan-rather...»Reply #20