Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

empedocles

(15,751 posts)
1. The author concludes - ' . . . allowing those things [trumpism] to be defined
Thu Aug 29, 2019, 09:43 AM
Aug 2019

as MERELY [emphasis supplied] a political problem . . . ]

in his argument for impeachment now . . .



. . . [methinks the author here might be missing something . . . that perhaps the Speaker, and the Founding Fathers have 'considered' with more depth]

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

The author concludes - ' . . . allowing those things [trumpism] to be defined empedocles Aug 2019 #1
Not sure I follow you. You are saying we are following Laura PourMeADrink Aug 2019 #3
The Constitution provides a political remedy for a President's malfeasance, not a judicial empedocles Aug 2019 #6
Yes, Impeachment is political but it does not mean Laura PourMeADrink Aug 2019 #9
IMPEACH NOW! spanone Aug 2019 #2
IMPEACH YESTERDAY Laura PourMeADrink Aug 2019 #4
Yep spanone Aug 2019 #14
Impeach! Impeach! Impeach the sunny beach, you betcha! abqtommy Aug 2019 #5
Just out: Vanity Fair on Impeachment Laura PourMeADrink Aug 2019 #7
Link did not work for me empedocles Aug 2019 #8
Sorry. Seems to work for me Laura PourMeADrink Aug 2019 #10
Is this the Aug 1 issue? empedocles Aug 2019 #11
I doubt it..article dated 8-28. May just be online? Laura PourMeADrink Aug 2019 #13
Kicking for later reading smirkymonkey Aug 2019 #12
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»New Yorker: Another look ...»Reply #1