General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: The electoral college is in trouble [View all]hot2na
(460 posts)Yes California, where I live; 40 Million people and the worlds 6th largest economy.
California gets 55 electoral votes. Wyoming (with 570,000 people) gets 3 electoral votes. In proportion to Wyoming, California should have 210 electoral votes. Why do the people of Wyoming have so much more power to elect a president than the people of California?
OK Vermont is also a small population state but by and large though, the odds are stacked against the big blue states. How else can the Republicans lose the popular votes in all but one election (2004) out of the last 7 general election cycles (34 years), and still win the presidency 3 times.
California is irrelevant in the selection of a President, thanks to the electoral college. That is why someone like Trump can tell the people of CA that they have to do a better job of raking the forests, claim no high speed rail for you, Try to derail its car emission goals (thankfully we fought him in court over that and won), on and on. In response all this California will vote in massive numbers against Trump in 2020 and guess what, It doesn't make any difference.
The Electoral College is broken and needs to be replaced by the popular vote. Anyone who argues against this is wrong.