General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Kirsten Gillibrand, two words as to why you went nowhere [View all]IndyOp
(15,744 posts)I can see how someone might see scapegoating, but see her part in this as larger than that of the other 6 female senators.
Jane Mayer's article in The New Yorker...
On December 1, 2017, seven female Democratic senatorsGillibrand, Kamala Harris, Claire McCaskill, Mazie Hirono, Patty Murray, Maggie Hassan, and Catherine Cortez Mastomet with Chuck Schumer to tell him that most of them were on the verge of demanding Frankens resignation. At least one of them had already drafted such a statement, and the groups resolve hardened further when some of its members learned of an impending Politico story that contained a seventh allegation, by a former Senate staff member. The accuser, whose name is being withheld at her request, was known to some of the seven female senators. The woman said that, in 2006, when Franken was still a comedian, he had made her uneasy by looking as if he planned to kiss her. The senator she had worked for hadnt known of the allegation at the time, but vouched for her credibility.
Minutes after Politico posted the story, Senator Gillibrands chief of staff called Frankens to say that Gillibrand was going to demand his resignation. Franken was stung by Gillibrands failure to call him personally....
Gillibrand then went on Facebook and posted her demand that Franken resign: Enough is enough. The women who have come forward are brave and I believe them. While its true that his behavior is not the same as the criminal conduct alleged against Roy Moore, or Harvey Weinstein, or President Trump, it is still unquestionably wrong, and should not be tolerated.
Minutes later, at a previously scheduled press conference, Gillibrand added insult to injury: she reiterated her call for Franken to resign while also trumpeting her sponsorship of a new bill that banned mandatory arbitration of sexual-harassment claims. She didnt mention that Franken had originated the legislationand had given it to Gillibrand to sponsor, out of concern that it might be imperilled by his scandal.
https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2019/07/29/the-case-of-al-franken