General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Event hall cancels mixed-race couple's wedding: 'Our Christian beliefs don't allow mixed weddings' [View all]Lonestarblue
(13,521 posts)The SC takes only about 2% seconds of cases from the appeals courts, which leaves a lot of power in the hands of the appeals courts. We have 13 US Appeals Courts, including the one for DC and the one for the Federal Circuit. Currently each SC justice oversees more than one district. That a lot of cases to oversee and most likely affects the number of cases the SC itself can take on. Your idea of reviewing laws quickly before they cause harm is important, yet it takes years for bad laws to get a hearing and they may go into effect unless a lower court judge issues a stay.
I would be in favor of 11 SC justices, with the Chief Justice overseeing both the Federal Circuit and the DC courts, as he does now. Two of the smaller (or less active) appeals courts might also be combined under one justice. There are so many more cases now, yet the number of SC justices has not changed in decades. I think we might have a more balanced court with more people on it so that one or two rabid ideologues are not able to do so much damage, as I believe Antonin Scalia did.