Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

In reply to the discussion: tweet of the year [View all]

mercuryblues

(16,507 posts)
13. Ok, let's treat guns, like cars then.
Tue Sep 3, 2019, 10:11 AM
Sep 2019

At 16, you are allowed to get a license to drive a car. In order to do that, you are required to have a permit for 6 months. During that time you are only allowed to drive, under adult supervision. You are required to drive x amount of hours, and have an adult sign off that yes indeed they accomplished that. The next step is to go to a driving school for formal instruction. At all driving schools they have a drunk driving class. For the purpose of gun ownership this can be a mass shooting class, showing the carnage a gun can do to a person.

Next step is taking a written exam and driving exam at MVD. If you fail, you start all over again.

If you pass, you get your license. Most likely you will be driving a car in your parents name and insured by them. When a teen driver is added to the policy, it jumps up. If the kid gets a ticket, it skyrockets. But in the case of gun permits, it should be if the person misuses it or "accidentally" fires it, shoots someone, the license is revoked. If the violation is serious enough, you get arrested and have a trial.

If you have a medical problem that is considered to dangerous to drive a car, you can't get a license.

Every 2 years it has to be renewed. Every year your insurance policy has to be renewed. If there are points against your license, your premium skyrockets. Sometimes to the point of not being able to afford insurance. By law, you must have insurance to drive. You see if you can not follow these simple rules, you are deemed too irresponsible to drive a car and the license is taken away.

Cars and car safety are regulated by the government. Think seatbelt laws, broken tail lights, MPG's, tires, how fast they can go, and more.

I say if they want to make the comparison, let them. We regulate cars and driving them more than guns.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

tweet of the year [View all] spanone Sep 2019 OP
I went out and looked at the twitter feed for this one. redstatebluegirl Sep 2019 #1
Cars have a purpose other than killing. StarryNite Sep 2019 #2
What a very odd thing to say. warmfeet Sep 2019 #46
And in some states you're required to carry liability insurance. Pacifist Patriot Sep 2019 #3
You can't drive in Tennessee legally without insurance. spanone Sep 2019 #4
Same in Florida. Pacifist Patriot Sep 2019 #5
And Pennsylvania. dchill Sep 2019 #12
And Texas cannabis_flower Sep 2019 #24
And New York. SergeStorms Sep 2019 #28
And Nevada. WinstonSmith4740 Sep 2019 #33
Ok, let's treat guns, like cars then. mercuryblues Sep 2019 #13
An insurance requirement could prompt insurance companies to require mental exams. Towlie Sep 2019 #26
Great! Let's make cars and guns equal. needledriver Sep 2019 #38
+1 Government buys from all who sell. Jail time for those have them after the buyback period. (nt) IndyOp Sep 2019 #39
You don't think the government regulates mercuryblues Sep 2019 #40
Insurance does not typically cover criminal or intentional acts. Caliman73 Sep 2019 #41
I'm pretty sure that is universal... Wounded Bear Sep 2019 #18
Probably Pacifist Patriot Sep 2019 #32
oddly it's not all 50 states.... spanone Sep 2019 #37
I retired in 2011, but for all the time I spent soldierant Sep 2019 #42
The gun militants never, ever win the guns vs. cars comparison. Paladin Sep 2019 #22
It's rare that one car can kill multiple people NastyRiffraff Sep 2019 #48
send that to Abbott for defending AR availability Hermit-The-Prog Sep 2019 #6
Done! spanone Sep 2019 #7
good on ya! Gov Greg Abbott needs push-back Hermit-The-Prog Sep 2019 #27
We are capable of categorizing guns Johnny2X2X Sep 2019 #8
Let's go back to the intent at the time the 2nd Amendment was passed. Lonestarblue Sep 2019 #11
And prove membership in a "well regulated militia"... Wounded Bear Sep 2019 #19
Brace yourself. Paladin Sep 2019 #23
Are the gun nuts offering to give up Twitter & Reddit for a quill pen? RainCaster Sep 2019 #30
Beats me. Why don't you ask them? (nt) Paladin Sep 2019 #34
I never waste my time on such people or groups RainCaster Sep 2019 #35
Yeah, the quill pen thing is a regular in their verbal arsenal. Paladin Sep 2019 #36
Would that be Aussie105 Sep 2019 #50
base the law on capability of kills per minute Hermit-The-Prog Sep 2019 #29
Assault weapons are not defensive weapons. yellerpup Sep 2019 #9
Yeah, but gunners -- even some here -- gotta be prepared for roving bands of 25 home invaders. Hoyt Sep 2019 #10
Yep. It was an effective marketing campaign dalton99a Sep 2019 #15
A good illustration of why gun manufacturers are a big part of the problem and victims should be Hoyt Sep 2019 #20
+ products liability law intends to protect the public from inherently dangerous items Ponietz Sep 2019 #31
I think one would want a 12ga. pump for home invasion. Hotler Sep 2019 #45
You'd think, but a shotgun apparently doesn't qualify the gunner for a man-card. Hoyt Sep 2019 #47
Yeah, but gun nuts will say "well actually" "some of those guns were sig sauer or other models" IronLionZion Sep 2019 #14
+1. dalton99a Sep 2019 #16
Just wait until the Aussie government sends their goons to oppress their people IronLionZion Sep 2019 #17
If the government is coming for you.. cannabis_flower Sep 2019 #25
Yeah, that's the one that gets me. yonder Sep 2019 #44
MAYBE WE CAN HIDE FROM THEM UNDER THE BED !!! trueblue2007 Sep 2019 #49
⇧ ⇧ ⇧ ⇧ ⇧ ⇧ ⇧ ⇧⇧ ⇧ ⇧ ⇧ ⇧ ⇧ ⇧ ⇧ ⇧⇧ ⇧ spanone Sep 2019 #21
yikes. No revolvers Demovictory9 Sep 2019 #43
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»tweet of the year»Reply #13