General Discussion

SergeStorms

(20,591 posts)

28. And New York.

Reply to spanone (Reply #4)

Tue Sep 3, 2019, 11:06 AM

Sep 2019

BOY, do we have to pay for insurance! Close to $1000 a year for liability and collision insurance.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

50 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

tweet of the year [View all] spanone Sep 2019 OP

I went out and looked at the twitter feed for this one. redstatebluegirl Sep 2019 #1

Cars have a purpose other than killing. StarryNite Sep 2019 #2

What a very odd thing to say. warmfeet Sep 2019 #46

And in some states you're required to carry liability insurance. Pacifist Patriot Sep 2019 #3

You can't drive in Tennessee legally without insurance. spanone Sep 2019 #4

Same in Florida. Pacifist Patriot Sep 2019 #5

And Pennsylvania. dchill Sep 2019 #12

And Texas cannabis_flower Sep 2019 #24

And New York. SergeStorms Sep 2019 #28

And Nevada. WinstonSmith4740 Sep 2019 #33

Ok, let's treat guns, like cars then. mercuryblues Sep 2019 #13

An insurance requirement could prompt insurance companies to require mental exams. Towlie Sep 2019 #26

Great! Let's make cars and guns equal. needledriver Sep 2019 #38

+1 Government buys from all who sell. Jail time for those have them after the buyback period. (nt) IndyOp Sep 2019 #39

You don't think the government regulates mercuryblues Sep 2019 #40

Insurance does not typically cover criminal or intentional acts. Caliman73 Sep 2019 #41

I'm pretty sure that is universal... Wounded Bear Sep 2019 #18

Probably Pacifist Patriot Sep 2019 #32

oddly it's not all 50 states.... spanone Sep 2019 #37

I retired in 2011, but for all the time I spent soldierant Sep 2019 #42

The gun militants never, ever win the guns vs. cars comparison. Paladin Sep 2019 #22

It's rare that one car can kill multiple people NastyRiffraff Sep 2019 #48

send that to Abbott for defending AR availability Hermit-The-Prog Sep 2019 #6

Done! spanone Sep 2019 #7

good on ya! Gov Greg Abbott needs push-back Hermit-The-Prog Sep 2019 #27

We are capable of categorizing guns Johnny2X2X Sep 2019 #8

Let's go back to the intent at the time the 2nd Amendment was passed. Lonestarblue Sep 2019 #11

And prove membership in a "well regulated militia"... Wounded Bear Sep 2019 #19

Brace yourself. Paladin Sep 2019 #23

Are the gun nuts offering to give up Twitter & Reddit for a quill pen? RainCaster Sep 2019 #30

Beats me. Why don't you ask them? (nt) Paladin Sep 2019 #34

I never waste my time on such people or groups RainCaster Sep 2019 #35

Yeah, the quill pen thing is a regular in their verbal arsenal. Paladin Sep 2019 #36

Would that be Aussie105 Sep 2019 #50

base the law on capability of kills per minute Hermit-The-Prog Sep 2019 #29

Assault weapons are not defensive weapons. yellerpup Sep 2019 #9

Yeah, but gunners -- even some here -- gotta be prepared for roving bands of 25 home invaders. Hoyt Sep 2019 #10

Yep. It was an effective marketing campaign dalton99a Sep 2019 #15

A good illustration of why gun manufacturers are a big part of the problem and victims should be Hoyt Sep 2019 #20

+ products liability law intends to protect the public from inherently dangerous items Ponietz Sep 2019 #31

I think one would want a 12ga. pump for home invasion. Hotler Sep 2019 #45

You'd think, but a shotgun apparently doesn't qualify the gunner for a man-card. Hoyt Sep 2019 #47

Yeah, but gun nuts will say "well actually" "some of those guns were sig sauer or other models" IronLionZion Sep 2019 #14

+1. dalton99a Sep 2019 #16

Just wait until the Aussie government sends their goons to oppress their people IronLionZion Sep 2019 #17

If the government is coming for you.. cannabis_flower Sep 2019 #25

Yeah, that's the one that gets me. yonder Sep 2019 #44

MAYBE WE CAN HIDE FROM THEM UNDER THE BED !!! trueblue2007 Sep 2019 #49

⇧ ⇧ ⇧ ⇧ ⇧ ⇧ ⇧ ⇧⇧ ⇧ ⇧ ⇧ ⇧ ⇧ ⇧ ⇧ ⇧⇧ ⇧ spanone Sep 2019 #21

yikes. No revolvers Demovictory9 Sep 2019 #43