Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: UFFS!(Friday Night) NOAA backs Trump on Alabama hurricane forecast, rebukes Weather Service [View all]The Velveteen Ocelot
(115,683 posts)14. Betcha kroner to krugerrands Barry Myers is behind this.
He's the current head of NOAA, and he's another typical Trump appointee - a businessman without any formal scientific training who opposes the agency he heads, and who has typical Trump administration ethics, or lack of them.
When President Trump first nominated Barry Myers, then the CEO of AccuWeather and a fierce critic of the National Oceanographic and Atmospheric Administration, to head the very agency he had spent decades attacking, many who care about government ethics sounded the alarm. The announcement seemed extreme, even by the loose ethical standards of the Trump administration which is partly why his first nomination stalled in the Senate in 2018. On Wednesday, the Senate GOP leadership plans to ram through Myerss renomination without a hearing despite his failure to address any of the major ethics issues that were raised the first time he went through this process. If anything, Myerss financial activity since his first nomination expired only heightens concerns about his ethics.
Myerss ties to AccuWeather remain deeply concerning. He recounted for the Senate how he and his family built the company from the ground up to become a dominant player in the weather forecasting industry. In addition to Myers serving as its CEO, his wife was its director of executive projects, and his brothers held more than 90 percent of the companys stock.
When his nomination was first announced, we were concerned about whether Myers could be relied on to oversee an agency that can directly affect his familys business. AccuWeather uses NOAAs free weather data to make its own predictions, which it then sells to the public. AccuWeather has also argued that NOAA should reduce the amount of weather information it releases directly to the public that is, much of the data generated by NOAA with our tax dollars would be available exclusively to private companies like AccuWeather that could then sell us forecasts based on that data. Myers himself has advocated that NOAA do less for America so AccuWeather can increase its profits.
Now Myers is back with a new nomination and a mysterious financial arrangement. A year ago, one of us, writing for the Campaign Legal Center at the time, warned the Senate that nothing in his ethics agreement would prevent him from selling his shares of AccuWeather to his family and, upon leaving the government, offering to repurchase those interests for the same price possibly even at a negligible price or, at least, without incurring any capital gains. And indeed, a few months ago, Myers sold his stock under a redemption agreement, which is a contract that lets a closely held company or its shareholders buy back an investors stock. Financial disclosure forms show that Myers sold for a fraction of what he previously claimed it was worth.
The rest: https://www.washingtonpost.com/outlook/2019/04/03/senate-is-rushing-confirm-this-trump-nominee-despite-ethical-concerns/
Myerss ties to AccuWeather remain deeply concerning. He recounted for the Senate how he and his family built the company from the ground up to become a dominant player in the weather forecasting industry. In addition to Myers serving as its CEO, his wife was its director of executive projects, and his brothers held more than 90 percent of the companys stock.
When his nomination was first announced, we were concerned about whether Myers could be relied on to oversee an agency that can directly affect his familys business. AccuWeather uses NOAAs free weather data to make its own predictions, which it then sells to the public. AccuWeather has also argued that NOAA should reduce the amount of weather information it releases directly to the public that is, much of the data generated by NOAA with our tax dollars would be available exclusively to private companies like AccuWeather that could then sell us forecasts based on that data. Myers himself has advocated that NOAA do less for America so AccuWeather can increase its profits.
Now Myers is back with a new nomination and a mysterious financial arrangement. A year ago, one of us, writing for the Campaign Legal Center at the time, warned the Senate that nothing in his ethics agreement would prevent him from selling his shares of AccuWeather to his family and, upon leaving the government, offering to repurchase those interests for the same price possibly even at a negligible price or, at least, without incurring any capital gains. And indeed, a few months ago, Myers sold his stock under a redemption agreement, which is a contract that lets a closely held company or its shareholders buy back an investors stock. Financial disclosure forms show that Myers sold for a fraction of what he previously claimed it was worth.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
35 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
UFFS!(Friday Night) NOAA backs Trump on Alabama hurricane forecast, rebukes Weather Service [View all]
underpants
Sep 2019
OP
Being united is taking him seriously, dead seriously, more seriously than our differences. nt
Blue_true
Sep 2019
#28