Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: BREAKING: DoJ has filed brief arguing the House Judiciary's impeachment inquiry ISN'T ONE. [View all]StarfishSaver
(18,486 posts)20. Once again, the inquiry began in June.
Y'all do realize what happened today, right? And can we give Speaker Pelosi some props for it?
Nadler and the other Judiciary Committee Members made clear that they have opened an impeachment inquiry that could lead to Articles of Impeachment against Trump.
And this has been managed brilliantly.
As many have pointed out, if a vote were taken today on the House floor on whether to open an impeachment inquiry, it would fail and fail badly. Pelosi and Nadler have very skillfully and expertly worked around that possibility. And this didn't just start today.
A month and a half ago, Nadler announced a series of hearings he promised would pursue targeted legislative, oversight and constitutional remedies designed to respond to these matters. https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2019-06-03/nadler-plans-mueller-report-hearings-starting-with-john-dean
In his announcement, Nadler very specifically stated that the hearings wouldn't be limited to legislative and oversight purposes, but also are targeted toward "constitutional remedies." The only constitutional remedy available to the House to respond to the behavior described in the Mueller Report is impeachment.
This language was very intentional. Among other things, it positioned the Committee to request grand jury materials under Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 6(e)'s provision that allows a court to release grand jury materials in connection with a proceeding "preliminarily to" an impeachment inquiry.
Today, the Committee announced not only that it is indeed conducting an impeachment inquiry, Nadler and the others said that this inquiry didn't start today, but has been going on for some time - but this is the first time they have come out and said it.
So we are now exactly where many people have been demanding we be. The House is conducting a full-blown impeachment inquiry. They are about to get a court order compelling Don McGahn to testify or face jail and fines. They are in court seeking the grand jury materials.
And they pulled this off without a House vote that would have gone down in defeat. This was a brilliant move by Pelosi to move the inquiry forward while protecting the more vulnerable and conservative members of her caucus from having to vote for one.
Nicely done, Madame Speaker and Chairman Nadler.
Make no mistake about it. Impeachment is in play, y'all.
https://www.democraticunderground.com/100212320474
Nadler and the other Judiciary Committee Members made clear that they have opened an impeachment inquiry that could lead to Articles of Impeachment against Trump.
And this has been managed brilliantly.
As many have pointed out, if a vote were taken today on the House floor on whether to open an impeachment inquiry, it would fail and fail badly. Pelosi and Nadler have very skillfully and expertly worked around that possibility. And this didn't just start today.
A month and a half ago, Nadler announced a series of hearings he promised would pursue targeted legislative, oversight and constitutional remedies designed to respond to these matters. https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2019-06-03/nadler-plans-mueller-report-hearings-starting-with-john-dean
In his announcement, Nadler very specifically stated that the hearings wouldn't be limited to legislative and oversight purposes, but also are targeted toward "constitutional remedies." The only constitutional remedy available to the House to respond to the behavior described in the Mueller Report is impeachment.
This language was very intentional. Among other things, it positioned the Committee to request grand jury materials under Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 6(e)'s provision that allows a court to release grand jury materials in connection with a proceeding "preliminarily to" an impeachment inquiry.
Today, the Committee announced not only that it is indeed conducting an impeachment inquiry, Nadler and the others said that this inquiry didn't start today, but has been going on for some time - but this is the first time they have come out and said it.
So we are now exactly where many people have been demanding we be. The House is conducting a full-blown impeachment inquiry. They are about to get a court order compelling Don McGahn to testify or face jail and fines. They are in court seeking the grand jury materials.
And they pulled this off without a House vote that would have gone down in defeat. This was a brilliant move by Pelosi to move the inquiry forward while protecting the more vulnerable and conservative members of her caucus from having to vote for one.
Nicely done, Madame Speaker and Chairman Nadler.
Make no mistake about it. Impeachment is in play, y'all.
https://www.democraticunderground.com/100212320474
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
40 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
BREAKING: DoJ has filed brief arguing the House Judiciary's impeachment inquiry ISN'T ONE. [View all]
Grasswire2
Sep 2019
OP
You ask an awful lot of question for someone who seems to think they're an expert on this
StarfishSaver
Sep 2019
#27
Random Members don't have power to decide if an impeachment investigation is occurring. Nadler does
StarfishSaver
Sep 2019
#35
So the f**k what, it is or isn't they can still holding hearings...wtf is the point.
Thomas Hurt
Sep 2019
#8
Impeachment DOESN'T mean Congress gets to be first in line" and doesn't make everything else the SC
StarfishSaver
Sep 2019
#14
If you had a better understaning of how Congress worked, you would know that "majority votes" is not
StarfishSaver
Sep 2019
#26