Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Kid Berwyn

(25,399 posts)
33. Do anything to obstruct justice Department of Justice.
Fri Sep 13, 2019, 08:53 PM
Sep 2019

Bill Barr, Capitalism’s Invisible Army.



Bill Barr: The “Cover-Up General”

"At the center of the criticism is the chief artic­ulator of Bush's imperial presidency," we reported in 1992, "the man who wrote the legal rationale for the Gulf War, the Panama invasion, and the officially sanctioned kidnapping of foreign nationals abroad"


by FRANK SNEPP
The Village Voice, APRIL 18, 2019

Snip...

For the next two years, as chief of the Justice Department’s Office of Legal Coun­sel, Barr played a key role in shaping Rich­ard Thornburgh’s stormy tenure as attorney general. In a job that was essentially politi­cal, he helped maintain the administra­tion’s ideological purity by screening out judicial candidates who weren’t conserva­tive enough. He also drafted two key docu­ments rationalizing the U.S. invasion of Panama and the seizure of General Manuel Noriega.

Snip...

In mid 1990, as Thornburgh’s own prob­lems with Congress deepened, Barr was tapped to run interference, and was named deputy attorney general. The appointment came just in time for him to draft another landmark tract for the administration, the legal pretext for the undeclared war against Iraq. It would have made any Nixonite proud. Explaining it later to Congress, Barr said he believed there was a “gray zone” between a declared offensive war and an emergency defensive action where “there is latitude for the president, if he believes that the vital interests of the United States are threatened by foreign military attack, there is room for him to respond.”

Barr did not make clear how the Iraqi invasion of Kuwait equaled an attack on vital American interests, but to his credit, at the moment of decision itself, he did counsel the president to soften the impact of his unilateral rush to war by seeking a declaration of congressional support. That piece of advice, much akin to Johnson’s leveraging of the Tonkin Gulf resolution, helped to keep the naysayers at bay.

Barr’s service to the administration, how­ever, wasn’t limited simply to such flashes of political savvy. In 1991 he became active in stone-walling the Iraqgate and the BCCI investigations and further gratified conser­vatives by keeping up the tattoo on their favorite hot-button issues. Embracing im­migration policy as his own, he helped craft an exception rule that automatically barred HIV-positive sufferers from entering the country. Civil libertarians charged illegal discrimination and even racism, since many of those excluded were black Hai­tians. Barr assured Congress that the policy was meant only to keep out people who might be thrown back on public welfare.

Flogging another conservative hobby­horse, Barr fought hard as deputy AG to keep federal courts from expanding their right to review state criminal convictions on writs of habeas corpus. As a devout Catholic, he also pandered to the antiabor­tion crowd, even “torquing” the law in Au­gust 1991 to advance their crusade. The challenge came when a federal judge in Wichita issued an order barring anti-abor­tion demonstrators from blocking access to a clinic. The Justice Department inter­vened to try to force a lifting of the ban. Later asked about this by Congress, Barr gave an exquisitely technical rationale, as­serting that though the demonstrators were “lawbreakers . . . treading on other people’s rights,” they “should be dealt with” in state court, not federal court — thus the federal judge’s order was unenforceable.

Continues...

https://www.villagevoice.com/2019/04/18/attorney-general-william-barr-is-the-best-reason-to-vote-for-clinton/



Barr is the rock from under which crawl all manner of the vilest treasons.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

ITTMF malaise Sep 2019 #1
Absolutely, K&R. Quit F'ing around the edges ... do it!!! n/t RKP5637 Sep 2019 #3
Okay, what is ittmf? oregonjen Sep 2019 #6
Impeach the treasonous mfer. panader0 Sep 2019 #12
Good to see you malaise Sep 2019 #21
Aw thanks. I'm here most every day, mostly reading. panader0 Sep 2019 #23
Thanks! oregonjen Sep 2019 #22
Barr fighting for t-rump! Iliyah Sep 2019 #2
Of course they have StarfishSaver Sep 2019 #4
Laughable FBaggins Sep 2019 #16
Once again, the inquiry began in June. StarfishSaver Sep 2019 #20
Not when you decide it was true FBaggins Sep 2019 #25
You ask an awful lot of question for someone who seems to think they're an expert on this StarfishSaver Sep 2019 #27
And you dodge a lot of them FBaggins Sep 2019 #30
Even the DoJ now with Barr wants to bring the US down. n/t RKP5637 Sep 2019 #5
Barr wants to command the US Sturmabteilung... Wounded Bear Sep 2019 #18
Would not be surprised at all!!! n/t RKP5637 Sep 2019 #32
As there are no 'laws' and/or 'regulations' about what one IS, elleng Sep 2019 #7
Exactly StarfishSaver Sep 2019 #31
You keep spinning it as Trump's lawyers FBaggins Sep 2019 #34
Random Members don't have power to decide if an impeachment investigation is occurring. Nadler does StarfishSaver Sep 2019 #35
So the f**k what, it is or isn't they can still holding hearings...wtf is the point. Thomas Hurt Sep 2019 #8
Their supeona power is hightened with Impeachment Inquiry The empressof all Sep 2019 #10
yes Grasswire2 Sep 2019 #11
Doesn't make much difference when Trump is ignoring them all... Thomas Hurt Sep 2019 #24
This message was self-deleted by its author Chin music Sep 2019 #9
I think the answer may be simple... targetpractice Sep 2019 #13
I don't think she's afraid the evidence isn't compelling Poiuyt Sep 2019 #40
Impeachment DOESN'T mean Congress gets to be first in line" and doesn't make everything else the SC StarfishSaver Sep 2019 #14
That's contradictory FBaggins Sep 2019 #19
If you had a better understaning of how Congress worked, you would know that "majority votes" is not StarfishSaver Sep 2019 #26
How odd FBaggins Sep 2019 #28
How do you think SCOTUS will rule on this? Grasswire2 Sep 2019 #15
This message was self-deleted by its author Chin music Sep 2019 #36
Could be part of the plan FBaggins Sep 2019 #17
The DOJ should just be referred to as Trump's attorneys world wide wally Sep 2019 #29
Do anything to obstruct justice Department of Justice. Kid Berwyn Sep 2019 #33
Nadler will respond shortly malaise Sep 2019 #37
oh damn Grasswire2 Sep 2019 #38
ROFL malaise Sep 2019 #39
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»BREAKING: DoJ has filed b...»Reply #33