Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

FBaggins

(28,774 posts)

34. You keep spinning it as Trump's lawyers

Reply to StarfishSaver (Reply #31)

Fri Sep 13, 2019, 09:15 PM

Sep 2019

And of course anyone who disagrees with you on a given day...

... but their position was predictable. It’s also a number of Democrats (including some senior to Nadler) who are saying that the House is not currently considering it. You’re claiming that “impeachment is what the House says it is” (close enough) but also that they delegated that to Nadler despite a lack of a vote doing so and the denial of those whose permission was not even sought.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

40 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

BREAKING: DoJ has filed brief arguing the House Judiciary's impeachment inquiry ISN'T ONE. [View all] Grasswire2 Sep 2019 OP

ITTMF malaise Sep 2019 #1

Absolutely, K&R. Quit F'ing around the edges ... do it!!! n/t RKP5637 Sep 2019 #3

Okay, what is ittmf? oregonjen Sep 2019 #6

Impeach the treasonous mfer. panader0 Sep 2019 #12

Good to see you malaise Sep 2019 #21

Aw thanks. I'm here most every day, mostly reading. panader0 Sep 2019 #23

Thanks! oregonjen Sep 2019 #22

Barr fighting for t-rump! Iliyah Sep 2019 #2

Of course they have StarfishSaver Sep 2019 #4

Laughable FBaggins Sep 2019 #16

Once again, the inquiry began in June. StarfishSaver Sep 2019 #20

Not when you decide it was true FBaggins Sep 2019 #25

You ask an awful lot of question for someone who seems to think they're an expert on this StarfishSaver Sep 2019 #27

And you dodge a lot of them FBaggins Sep 2019 #30

Even the DoJ now with Barr wants to bring the US down. n/t RKP5637 Sep 2019 #5

Barr wants to command the US Sturmabteilung... Wounded Bear Sep 2019 #18

Would not be surprised at all!!! n/t RKP5637 Sep 2019 #32

As there are no 'laws' and/or 'regulations' about what one IS, elleng Sep 2019 #7

Exactly StarfishSaver Sep 2019 #31

You keep spinning it as Trump's lawyers FBaggins Sep 2019 #34

Random Members don't have power to decide if an impeachment investigation is occurring. Nadler does StarfishSaver Sep 2019 #35

So the f**k what, it is or isn't they can still holding hearings...wtf is the point. Thomas Hurt Sep 2019 #8

Their supeona power is hightened with Impeachment Inquiry The empressof all Sep 2019 #10

yes Grasswire2 Sep 2019 #11

Doesn't make much difference when Trump is ignoring them all... Thomas Hurt Sep 2019 #24

This message was self-deleted by its author Chin music Sep 2019 #9

I think the answer may be simple... targetpractice Sep 2019 #13

I don't think she's afraid the evidence isn't compelling Poiuyt Sep 2019 #40

Impeachment DOESN'T mean Congress gets to be first in line" and doesn't make everything else the SC StarfishSaver Sep 2019 #14

That's contradictory FBaggins Sep 2019 #19

If you had a better understaning of how Congress worked, you would know that "majority votes" is not StarfishSaver Sep 2019 #26

How odd FBaggins Sep 2019 #28

How do you think SCOTUS will rule on this? Grasswire2 Sep 2019 #15

This message was self-deleted by its author Chin music Sep 2019 #36

Could be part of the plan FBaggins Sep 2019 #17

The DOJ should just be referred to as Trump's attorneys world wide wally Sep 2019 #29

Do anything to obstruct justice Department of Justice. Kid Berwyn Sep 2019 #33

Nadler will respond shortly malaise Sep 2019 #37

oh damn Grasswire2 Sep 2019 #38

ROFL malaise Sep 2019 #39