Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: There should be handcuffs. [View all]ewagner
(18,967 posts)15. Hmmmmm....
"... Barr would have to fly in the face of that plus public opinion, plus the House Judiciary Committee."
Maybe that's just what we need....maybe we have to force them to openly, brazenly defy the law...would that create enough of a public outrage to impeach the bastards?
Maybe that's just what we need....maybe we have to force them to openly, brazenly defy the law...would that create enough of a public outrage to impeach the bastards?
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
52 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
The DOJ is one of three possible "enforcers". The courts can also be used and this slow methodical
Atticus
Sep 2019
#4
Probably because most of the time the DOJ has acted. Now the DOJ flips off the House.
triron
Sep 2019
#18
I was thinking the same thing. Wouldn't it be all hell breaking loose if Nadler just had
rainy
Sep 2019
#30
Wow that's a broad clause, could mean financial restitution to taxpayers
bucolic_frolic
Sep 2019
#41
we need to do this and more, we should not be working with the fascists on anything
yaesu
Sep 2019
#16
How does that work? By what mechanism does Congress alone "defund the executive?"
ehrnst
Sep 2019
#26
and while the fascists get away with crippling our party we continue to work with them on
yaesu
Sep 2019
#17
Fines are quicker, and we know that under Barr, criminal charges will be dropped.
ehrnst
Sep 2019
#29
False dillema. There is a middle ground between "ignoring" and issuing a warant for an arrest.
ehrnst
Sep 2019
#28
How many politicians can you name that have faced an actual legal penalty for lying?
MadDAsHell
Sep 2019
#44