Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

StarfishSaver

(18,486 posts)
34. A few problems with your scenario
Tue Sep 17, 2019, 06:27 PM
Sep 2019

First, inherent contempt is not something that's done on the spot. There's a process for it and it takes to even get to the point where Congress could order someone arrested. Not only that, if they tried, there would be a court battle over it with the witness very likely to get an injunction preventing their arrest unless Congress first jumps through some complex and extended due process hoops. In addition, a Lewandowski hasn't committed contempt. He answered the subpoena, he showed up he answered every question except those over which the White House has invoked executive. Of course, we all know the executive privilege claim is bogus, but Lewandowski is not in a position to wave itvon behalf of the that has to be handled.

The notion of Congress hauling in recalcitrant witnesses under it's inherent and tempting sounds good, but in practice it's not feasible

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Lieu discovered there are other notes that Lewandowski has BumRushDaShow Sep 2019 #1
umm.. interesting to say the least. riversedge Sep 2019 #52
If you had seen the look on Lieu's face BumRushDaShow Sep 2019 #57
Those are *central* facts. That's why they called his mangy ass before them The Velveteen Ocelot Sep 2019 #2
Thank you mcar Sep 2019 #3
These are big words coming from you SfS. MontanaMama Sep 2019 #4
I couldn't see it today, so I'm happy to read your run-down FakeNoose Sep 2019 #5
Ditto; been away. elleng Sep 2019 #31
There was a sense of panic in the air as all the cable networks stopped showing the hearing. kentuck Sep 2019 #6
Im not surprised DENVERPOPS Sep 2019 #18
True. People forget that what Fox calls "liberal media" is actually corporate. Caliman73 Sep 2019 #22
Where would you put SCVDem Sep 2019 #58
Thom is left leaning media. Caliman73 Sep 2019 #87
I would put advancing the interests of the shareholders robbob Sep 2019 #80
We need more DENVERPOPS Sep 2019 #96
Yes. Get the lies and facts on everyone's record. Hortensis Sep 2019 #7
I pretty much no longer trust the courts, at least some of them. pangaia Sep 2019 #13
THAT's for sure. We have a lot of work to do before we get Hortensis Sep 2019 #15
K&R AnotherMother4Peace Sep 2019 #8
if the media were honest, it would wonder why republicans don't care about the country anymore spanone Sep 2019 #9
I agree! Ohioboy Sep 2019 #10
I think you are absolutely right. kentuck Sep 2019 #11
Yup, Jeffries just said they got the answers that they wanted BigmanPigman Sep 2019 #12
Thanks for this summary. Very helpful. I found it impossible to listen once Collins had the floor. diva77 Sep 2019 #14
I agree that those admissions were eventually made. But, if the average viewer was asked what Atticus Sep 2019 #16
"Bludgeoning witnesses into submission" isn't going to happen in real time on television StarfishSaver Sep 2019 #17
First, I said nothing to indicate that the submission be in "real time on television". Second, I Atticus Sep 2019 #27
A few problems with your scenario StarfishSaver Sep 2019 #34
The scenario with which you find fault is yours, not mine. Once again, I have not suggested any "on Atticus Sep 2019 #44
"court would be reluctant to interfere in a dispute between the executive and legislative branches" BumRushDaShow Sep 2019 #55
Sorry. You must have really said something wrong!!! Laura PourMeADrink Sep 2019 #66
That resonates with me. I watched a couple hours on a Fox link (Ack) and the comments were so Evolve Dammit Sep 2019 #24
What we need is for our free press to report the facts. kentuck Sep 2019 #26
So, true! StarfishSaver Sep 2019 #35
even PBS ... Hermit-The-Prog Sep 2019 #63
This! mcar Sep 2019 #62
Agree. Rome wasn't built in a day bucolic_frolic Sep 2019 #19
I am impressed nt Sunsky Sep 2019 #20
The republicans probably think they won today Mr.Bill Sep 2019 #21
Republican messaging seems to be based on 2 main techniques... CaptainTruth Sep 2019 #25
The Contract lawyer is doing a great job? avebury Sep 2019 #23
I. Will. Not. Be. Gaslit. Kurt V. Sep 2019 #28
Don't believe your lying eyes! gldstwmn Sep 2019 #91
I watched briefly. It was obvious that Republicans were obstructing an honest inquiry. TryLogic Sep 2019 #29
If Lewandowski is running for the Senate Mr.Bill Sep 2019 #32
Thank-you your assessment happy feet Sep 2019 #30
Democrats did not do fine today jiminvegas Sep 2019 #33
As a retired lawyer, you surely know that a congressional hearing is not a courtroom StarfishSaver Sep 2019 #38
The Democrats did great today. kentuck Sep 2019 #41
Post removed Post removed Sep 2019 #47
Not being a lawyer myself I appreciate your perspective. calimary Sep 2019 #68
This was not for looks today. Dems need to control the process of impeachment during the election uponit7771 Sep 2019 #39
K&R, I saw similar to what you claim here on Ari ... Red Don didn't have a good day uponit7771 Sep 2019 #36
maybe ok but not fine, every time fascists wouldn't take no for an answer their mic should be cut yaesu Sep 2019 #37
Nadler didn't "put up" with anything. He enforced parliamentary procedures of the committee StarfishSaver Sep 2019 #40
I agree to a point, but when they continue defacto7 Sep 2019 #45
The Democrats did a good job today? SCVDem Sep 2019 #42
i'm just now watching it. barbtries Sep 2019 #43
why did he keep saying, "I have asked and answered that question."? Hermit-The-Prog Sep 2019 #70
no shit. barbtries Sep 2019 #71
Yeah, I heard his blurb about not going to Harvard, etc. What does this have to do w/ anything?... SWBTATTReg Sep 2019 #88
Thank you for the reality check, StarfishSaver! pnwmom Sep 2019 #46
they did a stellar job as far as i can tell barbtries Sep 2019 #48
Thank you, thank you, thank you, thank you. soldierant Sep 2019 #49
Yep. madamesilverspurs Sep 2019 #50
LOL Kali Sep 2019 #56
01010 Chalfont Sep 2019 #51
Are you just adding to your post count? lunatica Sep 2019 #54
I'm glad you weighed in lunatica Sep 2019 #53
I agree JustAnotherGen Sep 2019 #59
We already knew all that. We already knew the witness talked to Mueller. wasupaloopa Sep 2019 #60
K&R... spanone Sep 2019 #61
Barry Berke tears Corey Lewandowski a new one Miles Archer Sep 2019 #64
Only if... Catch2.2 Sep 2019 #65
Exactly. Laura PourMeADrink Sep 2019 #67
Judiciary's Swalwell says there's going to be a cascade of Hortensis Sep 2019 #69
With thhe help of corporate media. Iliyah Sep 2019 #77
CNN is full of shit on this orangecrush Sep 2019 #72
I don't need "hype" to disagree with you... brooklynite Sep 2019 #73
What do you think the Demacrats could have done yesterday to sway public opinion?. StarfishSaver Sep 2019 #74
They could have not held the Hearing if it wasn't going to produce anything useful. brooklynite Sep 2019 #76
Ok. So please tell us what hearing WOULD have been useful? StarfishSaver Sep 2019 #78
I don't have an answer, but I'm not advocating for advancing Impeachment... brooklynite Sep 2019 #79
You don't have the answer StarfishSaver Sep 2019 #83
Spot on. cwydro Sep 2019 #75
Agree 100% Catch2.2 Sep 2019 #82
I have a feeling the Dems understand what they need to do just as well as anyone here StarfishSaver Sep 2019 #84
I have eyes and ears. We did terrible. If we had a spine Lewandowski would have been dragged Pisces Sep 2019 #81
"dragged away in handcuffs" StarfishSaver Sep 2019 #85
Bravo. gldstwmn Sep 2019 #92
Yup... Catch2.2 Sep 2019 #94
The Dems Also Were Able to Show Lewandowski Committed Perjury dlk Sep 2019 #86
I agree with Rachel Maddo that they need he lawyers to start te hearings copperearth Sep 2019 #89
These ARE the hearings StarfishSaver Sep 2019 #93
Sorry but no. Lewandowski should have gldstwmn Sep 2019 #90
+1 Pisces Sep 2019 #95
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Don't buy the hype. The D...»Reply #34