Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Impeach Trump [View all]kentuck
(112,326 posts)50. There does not have to be a full vote of the House to investigate anyone..
That job is designated to the House Judiciary Committee.
There has to be a vote of the whole House if they charge Articles of Impeachment.
Otherwise, the House Judiciary can investigate the White House all they wish.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
116 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
It is so much like right. And the only opposition I have heard is that
Laura PourMeADrink
Sep 2019
#14
Shall not may. It has a tangible meaning where The Constitution is concerned
ms liberty
Sep 2019
#33
I am a huge impeachment proponent, but admit there are days I think it's too late too.
Laura PourMeADrink
Sep 2019
#65
Thanks H2O Man. I imagine that Pelosi has not considered the risk of disaffected voters should
alwaysinasnit
Sep 2019
#60
One thing I don't get is that I remember Nadler saying he wanted to start writing up Articles
Laura PourMeADrink
Sep 2019
#63
I agree. And have been saying this for some time. The Democratic Leadership
berni_mccoy
Sep 2019
#69
Glaring is descriptive. Impeachment should have started prior to and parallel
PufPuf23
Sep 2019
#112