Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: "The public is not galvanized on impeachment b/c the House speaker does not WANT the public ..." [View all]standingtall
(3,148 posts)20. No it's reality
If Pelosi organized a vote for a formal impeachment inquiry. There would be no doubt by anyone including the press where she stands, because every Democrat including Pelosi would be on record with their vote.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
88 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
"The public is not galvanized on impeachment b/c the House speaker does not WANT the public ..." [View all]
sharedvalues
Sep 2019
OP
Sad to say, but unless she pulls a rabbit out of a hat, when her four years are up,
Baitball Blogger
Sep 2019
#9
So the only way the public can be galvanized is for Nancy Pelosi to do it?
StarfishSaver
Sep 2019
#7
Fine. Point me to 5 video or audio clips from the last week of prominent Democrats...
JHB
Sep 2019
#33
The message is actually pretty simple. Just take advantage of the background radiation...
JHB
Sep 2019
#81
I think it is accepted that Nancy Pelosi is the consummate politician. Warning... another rant...
not_the_one
Sep 2019
#57
If " nothing gets done without her approval or buy-in," how is the Judiciary Committee
StarfishSaver
Sep 2019
#58
Do you believe that if the house impeached Trump, the senate would convict and he would be
emmaverybo
Sep 2019
#51
Not what I am saying. You gave a good reason for impeachment, regardless. For me, the
emmaverybo
Sep 2019
#59
Definitely agree a landslide needed--for one, to wash out the "stupid/gullible" and malignant, and
emmaverybo
Sep 2019
#70
I don't even know what happened, what Pelosi said or did, what this OP is about.
betsuni
Sep 2019
#32
The most distasteful drinks are not served hot or cold, but like warm.
world wide wally
Sep 2019
#11
I'm going to clutch my pearls, get my smelling salts, and take a nitro tablet
Crunchy Frog
Sep 2019
#12
So which is it? Are you complaining that Pelosi hasn't galvanized public support for impeachment
StarfishSaver
Sep 2019
#21
So why all the complaining that Pelosi hasn't single-handedly galvanized the publix
StarfishSaver
Sep 2019
#35
The more trump gets away with his crimes, the less likely we'll have a fair/free election
ecstatic
Sep 2019
#16
lol, the areas of the country that like Pelosi already have reps that support impeachment
JI7
Sep 2019
#30
Nancy Pelosi holds that much sway over the public? Amazing. I don't think the public thinks about
emmaverybo
Sep 2019
#60
To all the people sarcastically saying 'gosh, who knew she had so much power'..
Kentonio
Sep 2019
#64
If she were deliberately subduing impeachment talk and she were all powerful, why is there still
StarfishSaver
Sep 2019
#75
I didn't say she is 'all powerful' and obviously nothing is going to stop impeachment talk happening
Kentonio
Sep 2019
#83
And there's a huge difference between "deliberately subduing impeachment talk"
StarfishSaver
Sep 2019
#84