General Discussion

Laura PourMeADrink

(42,770 posts)

111. Yikes this has zero to do with all she does and that she is

Wed Sep 18, 2019, 11:33 PM

Sep 2019

A female. Zero. It is the fact that we are not really writing and recommending articles of impeachment (not a priority)and we have not protected the 2020 election. And presumably we won't even slap Lew in the wrist with a contempt.

You could be a man with purple hair and green skin...and it doesn't matter. If you are not representing the views and very strong beliefs of most of our party...we aren't being led right.

Hopefully things will change soon when we have a nominee. It should be very interesting since all our candidates are for Impeachment and it was said today that Medicare for all was not her first choice.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

120 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Ok Nancy... get with the damn program.. unequivocally state [View all] TheSocialDem Sep 2019 OP

Makes you wonder Bettie Sep 2019 #1

+1 mysteryowl Sep 2019 #43

Attacks on Pelosi...that's novel. LexVegas Sep 2019 #2

I didn't Newest Reality Sep 2019 #3

A "a statement or inducement to act" doesn't deny the inherent potential of an attack as well. LanternWaste Sep 2019 #8

I see. Newest Reality Sep 2019 #10

I'm just gobsmacked at anyone imagining ordering the current Hortensis Sep 2019 #18

Yes, get with the fucking game. This slow-walk, demure, tentative, weak shuffle is an ugly, Magoo48 Sep 2019 #60

I have been waiting for the intelligence gldstwmn Sep 2019 #88

Yikes this has zero to do with all she does and that she is Laura PourMeADrink Sep 2019 #111

+1000! mcar Sep 2019 #64

No words JustAnotherGen Sep 2019 #79

The imperative "get with the program" implies that she's out of sync or unaware... NurseJackie Sep 2019 #20

you got that right, Nurse! And the OP had spelling errors Jeffersons Ghost Sep 2019 #47

Yea you're late to the correction party TheSocialDem Sep 2019 #50

Post removed Post removed Sep 2019 #67

Post removed Post removed Sep 2019 #90

Your cool just being obstructed at every turn? TheSocialDem Sep 2019 #4

One of the articles of impeachment against Nixon was for contempt of Congress Poiuyt Sep 2019 #30

What magic words will open these floodgates of information? ehrnst Sep 2019 #100

We can provide constructive criticism. This meme Laura PourMeADrink Sep 2019 #6

I agree. H2O Man Sep 2019 #31

The Biden and Pelosi supporters don't want to hear anything negative, even if its true Perseus Sep 2019 #44

I notice you keep lumping the Biden and Pelosi supporters together. StarfishSaver Sep 2019 #54

Um, Pelosi supporter here. calimary Sep 2019 #63

Thank you. Frankly, I am sick and tired of being lectured here for months re "attacking" Pelosi Nevermypresident Sep 2019 #69

I Agree brutus smith Sep 2019 #46

I see. We should just blindly, unquestionably gldstwmn Sep 2019 #86

On DU, at least. lindysalsagal Sep 2019 #104

Yup Laura PourMeADrink Sep 2019 #112

I smell borscht. nt JustABozoOnThisBus Sep 2019 #97

Yup. 2020 Laura PourMeADrink Sep 2019 #113

2nd that. triron Sep 2019 #5

Already the seeds being sown that holding Lew Laura PourMeADrink Sep 2019 #7

I hope he winds up in prison over gldstwmn Sep 2019 #92

For what?!?! What would that do that's not just topical? thx in advance uponit7771 Sep 2019 #9

It carries legal implications that TheSocialDem Sep 2019 #11

And the republicans know it and aren't afraid to flaunt it. triron Sep 2019 #12

Like what legal implications? BTW ... uponit7771 Sep 2019 #13

Why not go there though? Why not make the official statement TheSocialDem Sep 2019 #14

They did go there, in the official subpoana they say its also for the sake of impeachment ... uponit7771 Sep 2019 #16

because there are clearly qazplm135 Sep 2019 #24

Frankly I'm not certain of that at this point. gldstwmn Sep 2019 #93

well I am qazplm135 Sep 2019 #98

The judiciary is using the fuzziness of our official TheSocialDem Sep 2019 #15

No they're not, there's nothing about the impeachment process that says the judiciary has to hurry u uponit7771 Sep 2019 #17

Jail people gor contempt of Congress? Lol grantcart Sep 2019 #37

So why are we holding hearings if we can't do anything? brutus smith Sep 2019 #48

Holdingn hearings is doing something grantcart Sep 2019 #51

lewie admitted yesterday that he lied under oath not_the_one Sep 2019 #68

Lying under oath is not the same as perjury grantcart Sep 2019 #107

Congress doesn't have the authority to charge and arrest people for perjury StarfishSaver Sep 2019 #116

Who prosecutes on perjury? gldstwmn Sep 2019 #96

The fact that YOU don't know it doesn't mean it hasn't already been figured out by the people StarfishSaver Sep 2019 #103

Federal grand jury would indict but lying under oath isn't inherently perjury grantcart Sep 2019 #108

Perjury before Congress is a federal offence FBaggins Sep 2019 #99

Her argument is that "we need to bring the American people along with us". meadowlander Sep 2019 #85

The word impeachment has been thrown around ad nausea, local ... network and cable. Damn uponit7771 Sep 2019 #95

But Pelosi hasn't said it StarfishSaver Sep 2019 #117

Patience Wednesdays Sep 2019 #19

thanks,, i was going to say that,, but then... pangaia Sep 2019 #23

A medical practitioner including all the support staff right down to the janitors call them patients usaf-vet Sep 2019 #33

Recommended. H2O Man Sep 2019 #21

Nancy is Moving in the Right Direction dlk Sep 2019 #22

Bravo! bucolic_frolic Sep 2019 #27

:) dlk Sep 2019 #28

THIS Auggie Sep 2019 #40

Yes, We Can't Let Our Eagerness to be Rid of Trump and all of His Corrupted Cronies Force Any Errors dlk Sep 2019 #52

Just because he does more impeachable stuff TheSocialDem Sep 2019 #61

This message was self-deleted by its author Chin music Sep 2019 #53

This TheSocialDem Sep 2019 #55

This message was self-deleted by its author Chin music Sep 2019 #58

What are You Proposing? dlk Sep 2019 #59

This message was self-deleted by its author Chin music Sep 2019 #62

+1000 Nevermypresident Sep 2019 #70

So hard to even imagine doing all that again when Laura PourMeADrink Sep 2019 #110

We the People hold the ultimate power yet. Grasswire2 Sep 2019 #119

This message was self-deleted by its author Chin music Sep 2019 #120

How is that related? nt FBaggins Sep 2019 #71

He won't be able to put up a nominee if TheSocialDem Sep 2019 #73

That's not true. StarfishSaver Sep 2019 #74

Oh, well, not sure where I heard that but I could be wrong. TheSocialDem Sep 2019 #78

It's a common misconception floating around the internet StarfishSaver Sep 2019 #80

Um... sure he will FBaggins Sep 2019 #75

Exhausting to say the least. gordianot Sep 2019 #25

What program? bucolic_frolic Sep 2019 #26

Not judgement. Just official impeachment inquiry TheSocialDem Sep 2019 #32

This message was self-deleted by its author Chin music Sep 2019 #57

Right? I know exactly two people Bettie Sep 2019 #81

Exactly! Laura PourMeADrink Sep 2019 #114

I have to disagree with this gay texan Sep 2019 #29

Exactly, Pelosi has All of the Responsibility but Not All of the Authority dlk Sep 2019 #34

If Hillary had acted like Corey, the GOP would have the Sergeant-at-arms arrest her on the spot. SunSeeker Sep 2019 #35

yawn obamanut2012 Sep 2019 #36

I would also like a clear unequivocal statement because then a bunch of folks might stop... CaptainTruth Sep 2019 #38

But they wouldn't StarfishSaver Sep 2019 #45

+1,000,000 Laura PourMeADrink Sep 2019 #115

There isn't a majority in the House that supports impeachment Jose Garcia Sep 2019 #39

+1, not only that but it'd be best to go through the drawn out process during election. Take away uponit7771 Sep 2019 #77

Who is this "we" that you are speaking of dansolo Sep 2019 #41

You don't know if he's committed impeachable offenses? TheSocialDem Sep 2019 #42

What? brutus smith Sep 2019 #49

I'm saying we all know he has.. and the path to impeachment TheSocialDem Sep 2019 #65

We don't actually all know this StarfishSaver Sep 2019 #76

Oh please.... those no votes re impeachment are from red/purple districts. Nevermypresident Sep 2019 #89

So? FBaggins Sep 2019 #94

THAT'S your response? StarfishSaver Sep 2019 #102

No we have the majority because Trump is a Toxic douchebag standingtall Sep 2019 #66

Yes. She should Bettie Sep 2019 #83

we always required moderates or even conservatives in order to have a majority JI7 Sep 2019 #91

K & R! 50 Shades Of Blue Sep 2019 #56

I'm sure anonymous bloggers know best brooklynite Sep 2019 #72

any interest at all in holding the House? (nt) stopdiggin Sep 2019 #82

Agreed. Respectfully I do not want Pelosi gldstwmn Sep 2019 #84

Plus we haven't protected the 2020 vote so asking Laura PourMeADrink Sep 2019 #118

Recommended democrank Sep 2019 #87

she won't Skittles Sep 2019 #101

Speaker Pelosi is providing interference and time Baked Potato Sep 2019 #105

I am sick of it too tymorial Sep 2019 #106

K & R Duppers Sep 2019 #109