Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

triron

(22,240 posts)
20. They can also use "inherent contempt" and imprison and/or fine him.
Thu Sep 19, 2019, 01:23 PM
Sep 2019

No court order needed.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

And when did Cover-up boy sign on? GusBob Sep 2019 #1
That's correct on all counts. herding cats Sep 2019 #2
For our nation. A black eye. ffr Sep 2019 #25
Time for whistleblower to deliver copy to House committee. Sneederbunk Sep 2019 #3
That breaks the law and removes their legal protections. herding cats Sep 2019 #4
Yes. :) I'm remembering that after W announced we were Hortensis Sep 2019 #6
This one is going to be a battle, but I expect it won't take that long. herding cats Sep 2019 #9
Yes. Plus, court decisions we're waiting on Hortensis Sep 2019 #10
I suspect if The whistleblower is a patriot ... GeorgeGist Sep 2019 #5
Per the ICWPA they can only do so after the DNI dismisses the claim. herding cats Sep 2019 #7
What if McGuire just sits on it? shanti Sep 2019 #8
That's what he did originally. herding cats Sep 2019 #12
Jail him (McGuire). It's time to start upholding the law. LonePirate Sep 2019 #11
That actually might be a possible outcome. herding cats Sep 2019 #13
serious question. isn't detaining someone an executive function? stopdiggin Sep 2019 #14
Short version - Congress can cite him for contempt and go to court for enforcement StarfishSaver Sep 2019 #15
thanks stopdiggin Sep 2019 #17
Question: bluestarone Sep 2019 #19
They can try, but it's not as simple as some people think StarfishSaver Sep 2019 #26
Makes sense TY bluestarone Sep 2019 #30
... StarfishSaver Sep 2019 #35
This is what I'm hoping for here. herding cats Sep 2019 #37
Yes. Especially if the theatrics don't get us any closer to getting the info we need StarfishSaver Sep 2019 #40
Theatrics feed emotions and can fire up a base herding cats Sep 2019 #44
You are so right! StarfishSaver Sep 2019 #46
+1 uponit7771 Sep 2019 #54
They can also use "inherent contempt" and imprison and/or fine him. triron Sep 2019 #20
Who will they arrest and how will they do it? StarfishSaver Sep 2019 #21
It was used before. I assume it can be done. Otherwise it wouldn't have been. triron Sep 2019 #29
It was last done about 90 years ago. It so easy now StarfishSaver Sep 2019 #32
Only if it can be expedited. It would be interesting to know why it was usedd before. triron Sep 2019 #48
Can a Congressional Committee ever go straight to the Supreme Court, Mike 03 Sep 2019 #16
No. StarfishSaver Sep 2019 #18
Thank you! Much appreciated. Mike 03 Sep 2019 #31
Could this be a way to get at Barr? A copy of the complaint was given to Barr. If Schiff demands in2herbs Sep 2019 #22
Congress can't charge him with a crime, but if they get a court to order him to produce it StarfishSaver Sep 2019 #27
Exactly. herding cats Sep 2019 #36
Yes. It's the smarter move StarfishSaver Sep 2019 #38
It is a real shame we have no Enforcement agency in the Federal Government ... or... NotHardly Sep 2019 #23
They'll just assert more executive privilege bucolic_frolic Sep 2019 #24
LOCK HIS ASS................................Contempt is still fucking Contempt...................... turbinetree Sep 2019 #28
Who, IC IG Michael Atkinson? herding cats Sep 2019 #34
Atkinson is the good guy here. StarfishSaver Sep 2019 #39
Yes, he definitely is. herding cats Sep 2019 #41
I'm glad you're trying to explain StarfishSaver Sep 2019 #43
Here let me clarify my rant.................................and defend my self turbinetree Sep 2019 #55
This is DC we're talking about ... sal2019 Sep 2019 #33
Where's Ellsberg when you need him? Pepsidog Sep 2019 #42
Ought not there be a "back door" or some way to bypass all this rigamarole and red tape? NurseJackie Sep 2019 #45
I agree there should. herding cats Sep 2019 #47
The whistle blower saidsimplesimon Sep 2019 #50
Most definitely. herding cats Sep 2019 #51
I know. It's sad... frustrating and disturbing. NurseJackie Sep 2019 #52
I doubt that anybody the people calling for him/her to come forward StarfishSaver Sep 2019 #53
Boy, if the law is ever invoked and Trumpees who illegally protect Trump are imprisoned... Kablooie Sep 2019 #49
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»In regards to Michael Atk...»Reply #20