Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Mike 03

(18,690 posts)
6. This other theory...
Fri Sep 20, 2019, 08:51 AM
Sep 2019

He theorized that after the Ukraine told Trump to pound sand, Trump then promised Putin that Russia could increase military operations in Ukraine and there would be no sanctions.

That's another poster's theory, but I'm excited about it because the first two steps have panned out. It also fits with what we know about how Ukraine would respond to being blackmailed. And now you've got the White House and Giuliani trying to front-run this thing and make it sound completely normal.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Ukraine is NOT the story? [View all] kentuck Sep 2019 OP
Maybe it leads here. Funtatlaguy Sep 2019 #1
There could be another shoe to drop Mike 03 Sep 2019 #2
Also, where would the "promise" fit into the Ukraine story? kentuck Sep 2019 #4
This other theory... Mike 03 Sep 2019 #6
He may have "promised" Putin that the Ukraine would not get the weapons? kentuck Sep 2019 #9
That works too! That's excellent in fact. Does it fit the timeline? nt Mike 03 Sep 2019 #10
Don't forget. kentuck Sep 2019 #11
Hillary tried to tell us in 2016. triron Sep 2019 #30
Indeed she did. kentuck Sep 2019 #34
Or, as was posted elsewhere on DU.... ewagner Sep 2019 #43
Here's only one way: Trump promises Putin.... machoneman Sep 2019 #26
The whistleblower story has been out and simmering for a couple of weeks. Chemisse Sep 2019 #41
A diversion from a bigger story? Yes Firestorm49 Sep 2019 #3
I was thinking the same thing. Erda Sep 2019 #28
Yes because the Ukraine thing was already out there. Saw some thing about it on DU actually Dream Girl Sep 2019 #5
The real story? Iliyah Sep 2019 #7
Agreed. Shithole just keeps shitting. DemocracyMouse Sep 2019 #29
What did Trump offer NK for his photo op in the DMZ? Freethinker65 Sep 2019 #8
Lol. No, it's not Trump-Putin propaganda. We can be sure of that. Hortensis Sep 2019 #12
I believe what comes out of the House Intel Committee... kentuck Sep 2019 #15
All of them. We know nothing. Not yet. Hortensis Sep 2019 #18
I think you said the magic word - "conspire" kentuck Sep 2019 #20
Agree. I think we can responsibly assume conspiracy. Hortensis Sep 2019 #23
Thanks, great post. Mike 03 Sep 2019 #17
Me too. I believe the WaPo was the first major paper to report NYT's Hortensis Sep 2019 #22
Trump's phone call with the Ukrainian president was July 25. highplainsdem Sep 2019 #13
Ukraine is only part of the story Tommy_Carcetti Sep 2019 #14
That would be my guess also. kentuck Sep 2019 #16
Exactly... ewagner Sep 2019 #45
There's the man! Mike 03 Sep 2019 #19
+1 dalton99a Sep 2019 #24
Your guess is spot on lanlady Sep 2019 #42
Me too! ewagner Sep 2019 #44
This story has legs PhoenixDem Sep 2019 #21
Problem could be if Dems don't win the senate floppyboo Sep 2019 #33
As of this morning, we know it was a call to Ukraine. floppyboo Sep 2019 #25
Another possiblility MySideOfTown Sep 2019 #27
possible. Do you think this is another false flag, the call coming from Ukraine? floppyboo Sep 2019 #32
Storage tanks, remarkable accuracy MySideOfTown Sep 2019 #36
It was Saudi 911 except on 914. MySideOfTown Sep 2019 #37
The second to last crown of PNAC MySideOfTown Sep 2019 #38
Lets you and him fight. MySideOfTown Sep 2019 #39
Interesting, very interesting... pbmus Sep 2019 #35
I've been wondering when somebody would notice this: ewagner Sep 2019 #46
In normal times we would dismiss all of these theories Buckeyeblue Sep 2019 #31
It's the spy thing. The Ukraine is a diversion. Firestorm49 Sep 2019 #40
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Ukraine is NOT the story?»Reply #6