Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Governor Weld: "Pressuring a foreign country to interfere is treason," Penalty is death [View all]onenote
(46,091 posts)6. Okay. How do you define "enemy" then?
A country with which we have diplomatic relations. Give significant financial assistance. Is the subject of unanimous bipartisan Congressional resolutions supporting it and condemning Russian aggression. That has never been identified as an "enemy" under the "Trading with the Enemies Act."
That country is an "enemy"? No its not.
The Supreme Court, in 1863, offered the following explanation of the term "enemy" as used in the Constitution's treason clause: "The term enemies, as used in the second clause, according to its settled meaning, at the time the constitution was adopted, applies only to
the subjects of a foreign power in a state of open hostility with us."
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
88 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Governor Weld: "Pressuring a foreign country to interfere is treason," Penalty is death [View all]
grantcart
Sep 2019
OP
"...engaged in hostilities, whether or not lawfully authorized, with the United States."
LanternWaste
Sep 2019
#62
Yet we allow travel and trade. We maintain diplomatic relations. We cooperate on various matters
onenote
Sep 2019
#73
Is our relationahip with Ukraine today the same as our relationship with Japan in 1941?
onenote
Sep 2019
#5
Treason against the United States, shall consist only in levying War against them, or in adhering to
elleng
Sep 2019
#45
In my view, if there is proof, they pretty much have to or they are guaranteeing that
KPN
Sep 2019
#36
Fry his fat orange ass in the electric chair, and put it on pay per view, we could pay off the natio
Meadowoak
Sep 2019
#81
The definition and evidence requirement of treason is very specific in the constitution
grantcart
Sep 2019
#18
Normally I am opposed to the death penalty but I will waive my objections if he is convicted.
LonePirate
Sep 2019
#31
Well, at least the R's know how to not mince words. I wish our Dems would pick up a few pointers.
Crunchy Frog
Sep 2019
#60
So now we have one thread here supporting to kill politicians, and another one against it...
TomVilmer
Sep 2019
#69
How could that be? Been hearing for MONTHS from the anti-impeachment
Laura PourMeADrink
Sep 2019
#77
and as he is lined up in front of the firing squad, the nation would yell at the top of their lungs:
BigBearJohn
Sep 2019
#83