Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

In reply to the discussion: Make My Day [View all]

cognoscere

(461 posts)
49. Jesus H. Christ on a trailer hitch!
Sat Sep 1, 2012, 06:24 PM
Sep 2012

Are you channeling Gene Siskel? I ask because the late film critic for the Chicago Tribune had the same ability to watch a film and grossly misunderstand what he had seen. (a classic Siskel gaffe was him jumping up and down about the Rambo character in First Blood "killing all those people" when, in fact, Rambo went out of his way to avoid killing people. As I recall, the only certain fatality was the sadistic cop who fell out of the helicopter while he was trying to shoot Rambo who was trapped on the side of a cliff.)
Getting back to your analysis, Harry shot four people, all of whom had guns and were shooting at him. Whether they were trying to kill him or merely wound him is irrelevant because even in bass ackward Illinois, it would be considered attempted murder. It would also be considered four situations where deadly force was not only justifiable, but necessary as well.
Then, the guy in the yellow shirt who was apparently only hit in his right arm, gets up and grabs a hostage. Harry is about three feet away and has his pistol aimed at the guy's head. The guy's gun is NOT pointed at the hostage. It is NOT pointed at Harry. It IS pointed upwards in the general direction of the ceiling.
Now, if Harry was as bloodthirsty and homicidal as you believe, and he truly wanted to blow the man's head off, HE WOULD HAVE! An armed robber who shot at Harry and has a hostage? There isn't a review board or jury in the country that would find him guilty of murder or misuse of deadly force (unless, of course, it was a jury composed of twelve people like you)
No, Harry gave the man a chance, just as he gave all four of them a chance when he ordered them to drop their guns at the beginning of the confrontation. He was telling him, "Right now you are alive. If you put the gun down, you will stay alive. If you point the gun at the woman or me, you will die."
Aside from that, kudos on shining the light on yet another example of why Republicons should not be allowed to run anything more important than the fry machine at McDonald's and even that might be too much responsiblilty.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Make My Day [View all] Plaid Adder Sep 2012 OP
Kick. Hong Kong Cavalier Sep 2012 #1
Plaid Adder! hunter Sep 2012 #2
Plaid Adder! Hissyspit Sep 2012 #11
Plaid Adder - you've just made my day in a wholly good and wonderful way! scarletwoman Sep 2012 #3
Dear Plaid Adder Bohunk68 Sep 2012 #24
They were certainly howling for Obama's figurative blood. I don't know if he led or followed. nolabear Sep 2012 #4
Interesting analysis. sabrina 1 Sep 2012 #5
k and r, and spot on, as always niyad Sep 2012 #6
Exactly. lonestarnot Sep 2012 #7
Damn I've missed you. I think you're synopsis is dead-on. Please come around more often. Booster Sep 2012 #8
Spot on. CaliforniaPeggy Sep 2012 #9
The Dirty Harry movies were Clint Eastwood's reaction to lunatica Sep 2012 #10
There were cops and a police commissioner as vigilante bad guys in Magnum Force. Fumesucker Sep 2012 #25
That's very interesting. Plaid Adder Sep 2012 #30
I'm not really sure how much you can glean of an artist's personal politics from their work. Fumesucker Sep 2012 #34
Your quote is misapplied. swimboy Sep 2012 #35
I'm not sure what Plaidadder is trying to do.. Fumesucker Sep 2012 #38
The shift really took place in '71, with "Feel Lucky" as the catch phrase... reACTIONary Sep 2012 #50
Rethugs do seem to enjoy killing young black men. Hugabear Sep 2012 #12
You are sorely MISSED rocktivity Sep 2012 #13
indeed! ibegurpard Sep 2012 #33
k&r Electric Monk Sep 2012 #14
I couldn't stomach watching all of it, but I did notice from what I saw kas125 Sep 2012 #15
My father had dementia and he often had that very same confused look. nt Raine Sep 2012 #16
Wow! Thanks for this, Cha Sep 2012 #17
I am changing my mind on that Whisp Sep 2012 #19
k and R .....did not see goclark Sep 2012 #20
Watch Jon Stewert Aug. 31 Show burrowowl Sep 2012 #72
That was so GoOD! Thanks burrowowl! Cha Sep 2012 #75
Excellent post malaise Sep 2012 #18
excellent analysis marions ghost Sep 2012 #21
I'm seriously concerned what one of these nut cases will do if Obama wins. CrispyQ Sep 2012 #31
In their opinion, the second Civil War has already been set in motion. They call it CWII. Bernardo de La Paz Sep 2012 #36
We were talking about that last night abelenkpe Sep 2012 #55
WOW! Carolina Sep 2012 #22
Good one. cachukis Sep 2012 #23
Great analysis. 99Forever Sep 2012 #26
Hey Plaiddy! Cleita Sep 2012 #27
You're Overthinking It. Look At The Good Side. Paladin Sep 2012 #28
Did Rmoney make a speech at the RNC convention? Bernardo de La Paz Sep 2012 #37
Great analysis - love your writing as always...one point to add alcibiades_mystery Sep 2012 #29
I was flabbergasted to hear they added Clint Eastwood to the lineup Celebration Sep 2012 #32
I think they admire it Kali Sep 2012 #39
You're right. nt Chorophyll Sep 2012 #60
republicans are deficient in their powers of observation... ms liberty Sep 2012 #62
Yours is the first post that has really resonated with me. ocd liberal Sep 2012 #40
I agree with what you said that Clint is in trouble and you can see the signs of dementia TNLib Sep 2012 #41
Well, the way this embarrassed Mitt Romney's campain is funny. Plaid Adder Sep 2012 #43
gee... no wonder i miss your writing madrchsod Sep 2012 #42
me too.. Bluerthanblue Sep 2012 #66
Important to remember that someone else "staged" this moment, not Eastwood. Coyotl Sep 2012 #44
So good to see you posting here again livetohike Sep 2012 #45
"Clint Eastwood is not well." Who says? Not his younger wife or his offspring or his colleagues. As WinkyDink Sep 2012 #46
Agree with all the positive comments about your post, and glad to see your insight once again classof56 Sep 2012 #47
K&R, Right ON Analysis.... But it didn't start in the '80's.... reACTIONary Sep 2012 #48
Jesus H. Christ on a trailer hitch! cognoscere Sep 2012 #49
Why would Eastwood be referring to any of that except as a comparison to the Obama administration? patrice Sep 2012 #73
I have missed you, PA... awoke_in_2003 Sep 2012 #51
He didn't "make my day" as a female 40 years ago HockeyMom Sep 2012 #52
K&R Nt abelenkpe Sep 2012 #53
k & r n/t ejbr Sep 2012 #54
Plaid Adder! k+r TeeYiYi Sep 2012 #56
Thanks Clint... Clear Blue Sky Sep 2012 #57
Excellent analysis Veracious Sep 2012 #58
I can't tell you how much I appreciate your take on this. Chorophyll Sep 2012 #59
seems to me you read an awful lot into it hfojvt Sep 2012 #61
Wow. I had no idea. roody Sep 2012 #63
Good grief, I didn't remember the context of that phrase. The one I remember was, freshwest Sep 2012 #64
Agree...the chair was more of a crutch than a prop... cynatnite Sep 2012 #65
Reagan loved quoting those Dirty Harry lines. SunSeeker Sep 2012 #67
Adder! Generic Other Sep 2012 #68
makes it sound like Obama is crude going around saying Fu and F this lunasun Sep 2012 #69
The old swashbuckler The Wizard Sep 2012 #70
interesting, but Jon Stewart had a different take on the act: AnotherDreamWeaver Sep 2012 #71
I like them both. Cha Sep 2012 #76
LOL! TY. I missed that show. nt Incitatus Sep 2012 #78
Plaid! calimary Sep 2012 #74
You're back! Welcome. And thank you for the post. Good analysis. roguevalley Sep 2012 #77
I agree with item #1 krispos42 Sep 2012 #79
Wow. I didn't even know the full context ecstatic Sep 2012 #80
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Make My Day»Reply #49