Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Fumesucker

(45,851 posts)
20. Evidently the U6 is about 15% right now..
Sat Sep 1, 2012, 10:46 PM
Sep 2012
http://portalseven.com/employment/unemployment_rate_u6.jsp

Job recovery is scant for Americans in prime working years

http://www.washingtonpost.com/business/economy/job-recovery-is-scant-for-americans-in-prime-working-years/2012/05/29/gJQAnza9zU_story.html

The proportion of Americans in their prime working years who have jobs is smaller than it has been at any time in the 23 years before the recession, according to federal statistics, reflecting the profound and lasting effects that the downturn has had on the nation’s economic prospects.

By this measure, the jobs situation has improved little in recent years. The percentage of workers between the ages of 25 and 54 who have jobs now stands at 75.7 percent, just a percentage point over what it was at the downturn’s worst, according to federal statistics.

Before the recession the proportion hovered at 80 percent.

While the unemployment rate may be the most closely watched gauge of the economy in the presidential campaign, this measure of prime-age workers captures more of the ongoing turbulence in the job market. It reflects “missing workers” who have stopped looking for work and aren’t included in the unemployment rate.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

IIRC, 23 million jobs were *created* under the Clinton administration. CJCRANE Sep 2012 #1
Maybe, It is close to the number of jobs created under Clinton. Lone_Star_Dem Sep 2012 #7
I'm inclined to think your inclination Cha Sep 2012 #17
Surprised? elleng Sep 2012 #2
Who determines "they are not actively looking for work"? I suspect it is directly tied to UI Benes Vincardog Sep 2012 #3
I wonder if he got the 23 million number from the Romney people. gulliver Sep 2012 #4
Don't blame Clint johnnie Sep 2012 #5
LOL! n/t LeftofObama Sep 2012 #8
But I believe by most non-gov't sources, the Lionessa Sep 2012 #6
You are defending Clint and Romeny staff ... Really? DURHAM D Sep 2012 #9
There's the U3 numbers and the U6 numbers. Zalatix Sep 2012 #12
Evidently the U6 is about 15% right now.. Fumesucker Sep 2012 #20
The way I'm looking at it, I'm defending the 12.5 million uncounted un- Lionessa Sep 2012 #14
You can read the last paragraph up in the OP excerpt, instead of making up your own numbers n/t Tx4obama Sep 2012 #15
I wonder how many of those "unemployed" that are even "accurately" reflected in the numbers zbdent Sep 2012 #10
imagine that, a lyin' teabugger spanone Sep 2012 #11
Hint: he's an ACTOR! Hi profession is to deceive. fascisthunter Sep 2012 #13
Yeah, he's a MF Liar just like mitt and mini mitt. Cha Sep 2012 #16
That might actually be a low number Hydra Sep 2012 #18
Eastwood is a Republican. Terra Alta Sep 2012 #19
Depends on what he means by "unemployment." Igel Sep 2012 #21
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Clint Eastwood LIED. U.S....»Reply #20