General Discussion

Fla Dem

(27,641 posts)

30. I just hope the Dem members use their time efficiently.

Reply to mucifer (Original post)

Sun Sep 29, 2019, 11:13 AM

Sep 2019

Not too much grandstanding and preambles before asking direct and pointed questions.

Examples:

Kamala Harris

Elizabeth Warren

Amy Klobuchar

Maxine Waters

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

59 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Pelosi is Choosing Schiff over Nadler to Run Impeachment Investigation [View all] mucifer Sep 2019 OP

I love Adam Schiff, always been my favorite congressman. dewsgirl Sep 2019 #1

I wish Schiff could be our next president! ananda Sep 2019 #17

I know. Maybe someday. dewsgirl Sep 2019 #19

Nah, he should be the next speaker nt Fiendish Thingy Sep 2019 #36

I tend to agree. pangaia Sep 2019 #38

Good choice. Sciff is really sharp and quick. empedocles Sep 2019 #2

this impeachment is a matter of national security. Schiff should lead the effort Takket Sep 2019 #3

Thank you. Painting this as a Dem infighting story is missing the point. (nt) klook Sep 2019 #4

Exactly. The MSM always has to spin it in some negative fashion onetexan Sep 2019 #13

The WaPo story has it as amicable not fractured mucifer Sep 2019 #16

There are overtones of it being somewhat of a diss on Nadler onetexan Sep 2019 #20

There they go creating a divisiveness that isn't there. lunatica Sep 2019 #44

I am confident Adam Schiff is right for the job. TheRealistRealist Sep 2019 #5

They would have found something else. I'm fine with the republicans publicizing Schiff's comments. dem4decades Sep 2019 #9

I agree, I watched it live and I knew Trump would make hay with it. Mars and Minerva Sep 2019 #24

LOL! lunatica Sep 2019 #45

Of course. He's decisive, quick-thinking, cautious yet very good at articulating issues and it is hlthe2b Sep 2019 #6

Nothing irritates Trump like a Californian bucolic_frolic Sep 2019 #7

Except a Chicagoan. mucifer Sep 2019 #8

That toddlin' town... Harker Sep 2019 #12

or a Baltimorian LOL Takket Sep 2019 #41

This is fine. But BARRY BERKE-- STAFF COUNSEL! sharedvalues Sep 2019 #10

That is so important! True Blue American Sep 2019 #14

I was thinking the same thing Poiuyt Sep 2019 #15

Exactly. We need a f*cking army of Barry H. Berke's. (n/t) SMC22307 Sep 2019 #32

That was exactly my first reaction while watching. Schiff DEFINITELY has to fix that. ancianita Sep 2019 #46

OMG ... This should be screamed to the highest hills !! uponit7771 Sep 2019 #50

I don't think it should be limited to just Ukraine. LiberalFighter Sep 2019 #11

I'm mixed on that. Ligyron Sep 2019 #21

Impeach more than once. Two simpler investigations and votes. Why not? lostnfound Sep 2019 #42

Because, if you impeach once and fail to convict... regnaD kciN Sep 2019 #54

Or else, it could be easy to paint trump as a walking talking high crime and misdemeanor lostnfound Sep 2019 #59

The problem with focusing on Ukraine... regnaD kciN Sep 2019 #56

Well "choosing" might have been moot. This involves an intelligence breach by tRump. Texin Sep 2019 #18

Schiff is the right choice. This is a grueling process. Nadler has done a fine job but Schiff is Pepsidog Sep 2019 #22

Good choice jcgoldie Sep 2019 #23

Well Lawrence Tribe just gave Schiff high praise malaise Sep 2019 #25

Great news. zentrum Sep 2019 #26

Schiff Would Have Left Lewandowski Trembling In His Boots corbettkroehler Sep 2019 #27

I like this call kozar Sep 2019 #28

I don't think Nadler was being dissed; it's just that Schiff's committee The Velveteen Ocelot Sep 2019 #29

I just hope the Dem members use their time efficiently. Fla Dem Sep 2019 #30

Thanks for posting these vids. Each one of these people did an PatrickforO Sep 2019 #34

This message was self-deleted by its author Chin music Sep 2019 #35

I liked how Schiff handled the questioning of Joseph PatrickforO Sep 2019 #31

With all due respect to Nadler, I think Schiff is the better choice. CaptainTruth Sep 2019 #33

I like Nadler, but Schiff is the right choice between the two. I believe Schiff can connect the ... marble falls Sep 2019 #37

Maquire questioning Python boot Sep 2019 #39

It's the difference in committees, too, not just Schiff DeminPennswoods Sep 2019 #40

The main difference is that Intel Comte gets intel and Judiciary does not -- which ancianita Sep 2019 #47

Definitely agree. Trump has admitted he did it. DeminPennswoods Sep 2019 #48

Exactly. Facts over evidence fabrication as the basis of political drama stories. ancianita Sep 2019 #49

That worries me. Evidence that is secret can't be used to persuade the American people. dem4decades Sep 2019 #51

That worries me, too. The fact that lawyers in Congress can see the intel, however, in a ancianita Sep 2019 #53

And there seems to be leaks when all else fails. dem4decades Sep 2019 #55

Again, the evidence is in plain sight. Trump. Admitted. It. DeminPennswoods Sep 2019 #58

Great move. WinstonSmith4740 Sep 2019 #43

Nadler's committee drafts Articles, Schiff gathers the evidence. Thomas Hurt Sep 2019 #52

Glad to see that Nadler took it well Sanity Claws Sep 2019 #57