Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

What? jberryhill Oct 2019 #1
Said it better than me exboyfil Oct 2019 #3
Judges are human too. As long as they adjudicate in a completely professional and judicious manner hlthe2b Oct 2019 #8
So, you are down with cops giving out gospel tracts.... jberryhill Oct 2019 #13
Promotion of religious beliefs by a state employee, Ms. Toad Oct 2019 #35
Judges have no business getting off the bench and approaching either party LiberalFighter Oct 2019 #45
It's an inherently coercive situation. Crunchy Frog Oct 2019 #48
She'd already been sentenced, so no. hlthe2b Oct 2019 #50
Aside from anything else, sentencing is not the end of a criminal trial. Ms. Toad Oct 2019 #77
I actually d_r Oct 2019 #65
I was asking about other religious tracts sarisataka Oct 2019 #11
If it was a non-Christian religion jberryhill Oct 2019 #17
Have you heard of Freedom From Religion? JonLP24 Oct 2019 #23
I have heard of them, it is not their actions I questioned sarisataka Oct 2019 #29
Christians are the majority so they aren't being discriminated against in the US JonLP24 Oct 2019 #31
+1 Docreed2003 Oct 2019 #28
THANK YOU!! nt tblue37 Oct 2019 #39
Hugging her and giving her a Bible while in Court exboyfil Oct 2019 #2
And the victim's brother hugged the defendant. What a LuckyLib Oct 2019 #32
I don't have nearly as much an issue with that exboyfil Oct 2019 #33
There seem to be judges who relish high profile cases RhodeIslandOne Oct 2019 #74
What the victim's brother did was fine. Loki Liesmith Oct 2019 #78
The was nothing coerced about it--not part of sentencing or any requirement expectation so hlthe2b Oct 2019 #4
"a personal interjection of the judge's faith" jberryhill Oct 2019 #6
None of these happened. No strawman arguments for me today, jberryhill. Take it elsewhere. hlthe2b Oct 2019 #12
It's the principle jberryhill Oct 2019 #15
Not with me. I don't buy into changing to strawman arguments as a tactic. It is dishonest BYE hlthe2b Oct 2019 #18
In other words... jberryhill Oct 2019 #19
NO "in other words" Strawman substitution arguments are dishonest. Again, I have no desire hlthe2b Oct 2019 #21
You said "none of these happened" jberryhill Oct 2019 #22
. . . hatrack Oct 2019 #42
The op you replied to ends with a straw man question FreeState Oct 2019 #67
I can't imagine ever being on trial for murder, but as an atheist, I would be incredibly tblue37 Oct 2019 #41
because hlthe2b Oct 2019 #44
It seems to me there have been cases over the years where a police officer had done just that. A HERETIC I AM Oct 2019 #20
I took every example from actual cases jberryhill Oct 2019 #25
This doesn't really mean much to me one way or the other. The trial was over, the sentence had been Arkansas Granny Oct 2019 #5
So, when you get a traffic ticket, and the cop hands you one of these.... jberryhill Oct 2019 #9
If she was in the courtroom and wearing her robes she was "on the clock". meadowlander Oct 2019 #53
The complaint is valid regardless. Caliman73 Oct 2019 #7
The atheist group is correct. Goodheart Oct 2019 #10
Yes indeed. Owl Oct 2019 #38
Freedom from Religion probably would JonLP24 Oct 2019 #14
I saw that on twitter Beringia Oct 2019 #16
if the judge was on the clock sounds like grounds for a mistrial nt msongs Oct 2019 #24
I'm an atheist of 50+ years, and I don't mind if she gave her a Bible. MineralMan Oct 2019 #26
For me, it is not so much the specifics of a bible.. luvs2sing Oct 2019 #30
It boggles my mind. luvs2sing Oct 2019 #27
Without knowing the details of what was disclosed in court ecstatic Oct 2019 #34
Seperation of church and state is very important to Freedom From Religion JonLP24 Oct 2019 #36
Their name is stupid. pintobean Oct 2019 #40
Not the first time I heard that JonLP24 Oct 2019 #43
They seem to go overboard, to me. pintobean Oct 2019 #49
So do I JonLP24 Oct 2019 #52
That's an odd understanding of the First Amendment jberryhill Oct 2019 #59
From what I understand pintobean Oct 2019 #69
So are you saying the 1st Amendment does not apply to those... GReedDiamond Oct 2019 #62
Atheists are so intolerant - always killing non-atheists jberryhill Oct 2019 #72
Yeah, but you forgot about the disemboweling... GReedDiamond Oct 2019 #73
I don't have a problem with the Judge giving the convicted woman a Bible. Captain Stern Oct 2019 #37
Let me put it this way. Ms. Toad Oct 2019 #57
That's pretty much what I said...just with more words. I agree. n/t Captain Stern Oct 2019 #79
You're making the distinction based on timing Ms. Toad Oct 2019 #80
Yet again, I agree n/t Captain Stern Oct 2019 #82
You would think a judge would know better? yortsed snacilbuper Oct 2019 #46
agreed Skittles Oct 2019 #64
I think it was very unprofessional and inappropriate. Crunchy Frog Oct 2019 #47
Tammy Kemp is a good Dallas Democrat Horse with no Name Oct 2019 #51
Neither her party, nor anything else, makes it any less a violation of the first amendment Ms. Toad Oct 2019 #58
Well by all means, let's work to remove her from the bench Horse with no Name Oct 2019 #61
Did I suggest working to remove her from the bench? Ms. Toad Oct 2019 #68
It's good that we have courts to extend Christian grace jberryhill Oct 2019 #60
This message was self-deleted by its author geralmar Oct 2019 #54
The judge and Botham's brother certainly interrupted activist agendas. Sneederbunk Oct 2019 #55
I don't support this judge's actions at all. WhiskeyGrinder Oct 2019 #56
And then Atheists wonder why they are hated. MicaelS Oct 2019 #63
I don't wonder why Christians hate other people so passionately jberryhill Oct 2019 #70
Might I ask where you got your "every other president?" DFW Oct 2019 #81
I should have said most, so point taken. MicaelS Oct 2019 #84
Strangest ending of a Court Session I've ever seen. Alea Oct 2019 #66
Everyone here has the right to reject a Bible from this judge if she were to offer one. Kaleva Oct 2019 #71
this is a tough one for me Kali Oct 2019 #75
Nobody in any profession should do this. nt UniteFightBack Oct 2019 #76
What is the legal remedy here? fescuerescue Oct 2019 #83
I'm not an Atheist and I think she crossed the line. Autumn Oct 2019 #85
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Atheist group says Texas ...»Reply #73