General Discussion

TidalWave46

(2,061 posts)

46. I fully accept the word "rarely" over the word I used, which was "often."

Reply to The Velveteen Ocelot (Reply #44)

Tue Oct 8, 2019, 03:49 PM

Oct 2019

I still don't think SS is a lawyer. Numerous things they have said lead me to believe that.

I was brought to read about lawyers lying to judges when I personally witnessed it as a juror. I was shocked that the judge did nothing about it. I did follow up. No actions were taken. I found out there are many good reasons a judge will do absolutely nothing about a lie. I think the word "rarely" works just because of how many lawyers are actually in front of judges every day. As you know, it's a lot.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

64 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

DOJ lawyer can't tell judge the grand jury materials weren't shared with foreign governments [View all] StarfishSaver Oct 2019 OP

holy shit EveHammond13 Oct 2019 #1

This ScratchCat Oct 2019 #2

Wow. Congress can't see them but hey - Russia here you go! Claritie Pixie Oct 2019 #3

Putin had a need to know the contents of the documents. Maybe they reveal names NCjack Oct 2019 #47

What do you want to bet that Putin got a copy The Velveteen Ocelot Oct 2019 #4

Nobody is supposed to get them period ScratchCat Oct 2019 #9

Exactly. But especially not Putin. The Velveteen Ocelot Oct 2019 #53

I think Trump will somehow block him like he did the others. Congress would do well to subpoena Maraya1969 Oct 2019 #64

The Four Treasons, bringin' down the house FakeNoose Oct 2019 #50

Plus one . . . Iliyah Oct 2019 #54

JFC! fleur-de-lisa Oct 2019 #5

Shared with Russia but not with our own Congress. lagomorph777 Oct 2019 #6

This was totally buried way down in the story StarfishSaver Oct 2019 #7

Thanks for pointing it out! lagomorph777 Oct 2019 #8

I'm going to guess that the lawyer didn't know the answer, just as he/she stated. TidalWave46 Oct 2019 #10

Agree. Be cautious in assuming this means they were DrToast Oct 2019 #16

But the fact that the lawyer doesn't know is very troubling StarfishSaver Oct 2019 #19

Well the Judge wants an answer by Friday DrToast Oct 2019 #20

This lawyer shouldn't know. TidalWave46 Oct 2019 #25

The lawyer should know if it was shared with anyone StarfishSaver Oct 2019 #27

How would the lawyer know if, say, Barr shared it with someone? DrToast Oct 2019 #28

That's my point StarfishSaver Oct 2019 #30

Not in this situation. At all. TidalWave46 Oct 2019 #29

This! n/t MFGsunny Oct 2019 #52

Can you plead the 5th at a hearing? TrogL Oct 2019 #34

Lawyers can't plead the fifth..... getagrip_already Oct 2019 #35

Campaign law wouldn't require this lawyer to tell the FEC... TidalWave46 Oct 2019 #36

Lawyers don't "often lie in court" and lawyers lying in court is not "a time-honored tradition" StarfishSaver Oct 2019 #39

Judges rarely do anything about it. TidalWave46 Oct 2019 #41

I don't know where you practice law, but it sounds like some place out of a Grisham or Turow novel StarfishSaver Oct 2019 #42

This message was self-deleted by its author TidalWave46 Oct 2019 #43

I believe SS is a lawyer, and so am I (retired). The Velveteen Ocelot Oct 2019 #44

I fully accept the word "rarely" over the word I used, which was "often." TidalWave46 Oct 2019 #46

I have a law degree StarfishSaver Oct 2019 #45

I got mine at Costco jberryhill Oct 2019 #62

To be clear... jberryhill Oct 2019 #60

Thanks for the post. TidalWave46 Oct 2019 #61

True StarfishSaver Oct 2019 #63

"'I don't know the answer to that,'" dchill Oct 2019 #11

Thanks for posting this Midnightwalk Oct 2019 #12

I think a simple "No" would have been the proper response there... Wounded Bear Oct 2019 #13

We're going to need an answer, but it's possible the lawyer just didn't know DrToast Oct 2019 #15

I get what you're saying... Wounded Bear Oct 2019 #17

This is HUGE malaise Oct 2019 #14

Oh, and one more thing ScratchCat Oct 2019 #18

To ask that question, does the judge already have an idea of the answer ? OnDoutside Oct 2019 #21

It's very interesting the Judge asked it, yes! DrToast Oct 2019 #22

I wondered that myself. It was a really odd question StarfishSaver Oct 2019 #23

How did that question come up, right? Nevilledog Oct 2019 #24

Remember that the Grand Juries there BumRushDaShow Oct 2019 #37

Wish we knew what she knew! Nevilledog Oct 2019 #49

Honestly? I wouldn't want to be her! BumRushDaShow Oct 2019 #56

I was just thinking the same thing. StarfishSaver Oct 2019 #58

First question that jumped to my mind too! MadLinguist Oct 2019 #26

That would be nice !!! OnDoutside Oct 2019 #31

Oh, lookee here! VMA131Marine Oct 2019 #32

All in cahoots. eom sprinkleeninow Oct 2019 #48

No pulling the wool over that judge's eyes bucolic_frolic Oct 2019 #33

Foriegn governments, aka the co-conspiring country that aided tRump? Certanly. ffr Oct 2019 #38

If I was the lawyer unless I knew specifically the answer lettucebe Oct 2019 #40

The lawyer should have been better prepared . . . Iliyah Oct 2019 #51

OT: what does google.com have to do with cnbc.com? Hermit-The-Prog Oct 2019 #55

It's a CNBC story StarfishSaver Oct 2019 #57

if you click the OP link it goes to google which then goes to cnbc Hermit-The-Prog Oct 2019 #59