Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

SWBTATTReg

(26,347 posts)
1. This particular judge from what I read is questioning the concept of not being able to indict a ...
Wed Oct 9, 2019, 10:17 AM
Oct 2019

sitting president, calling it (the rule / concept / practice of not criminally charging a president) basically ridiculous (in my words) and I agree w/ him. Probably a lot of other people do too. Otherwise, you get exactly the behavior and attitude of what we in rump today. Totally deliberately ignoring the concept of lawful behavior openly. Ignoring (and telling others) to ignore lawful summons to proceedings, requests for paperwork on particular topics of oversight, etc.

I am amazed that anyone could ever find that the president / executive branch could be immune to prosecution just because they are president. BS. Absolutely BS and if they are, then we need to immediately change or get rid of the concept of 'president' in this country...and replace it with something else.

Only f**king rump would abuse this whole concept. What a jerk and total a&&hole. He could have been a decent president but he obviously had something else in mind. E.g., rip off the taxpayers massively.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Trump Tax Return Ruling C...»Reply #1