Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

johnlucas

(1,250 posts)
25. 1948 & 1964 is what changed
Mon Sep 3, 2012, 11:55 AM
Sep 2012

I just wrote a whole monster of a post called A long story about The Southern Strategy breaking down the entire history of the political parties in the USA & what drives their changes.

Black People is what drives the changes, the realignments. From the very beginning all the way to today.

In our current context the years 1948 & 1964 explain why all of those FDR Union Democrats became the suckers for the modern-day Republican Party & all of its senseless acts.

1948 is the year that Democrat President Harry S. Truman desegregated the Military.
That's the same year that Democrat Governor Strom Thurmond ran for President under the new "States' Rights Democrat" banner AKA the Dixiecrats.

Ya see, Truman was from Missouri (that famous state from the 1820 Missouri Compromise on the slavery issue) & a Southerner himself (grew up on a farm & everything).
Thurmond being another Southerner from South Carolina felt this was a betrayal from the party who fought on behalf of Confederate Cause in the War Between The States of the 1860s.
That Confederate Cause being the upholding of slavery institution that made the Agricultural empire of the Plantations rich.
It goes all the way back to that Southern plantation owner from Virginia Thomas Jefferson, the emblematic leader of the original Democratic-Republican Party (look up the Greek & Latin origin of the root words in 'Democratic-Republican' to see where this idea of "States' Rights" come from).

Democrats fight AGAINST the Negroes not FOR the Negroes!!
This Is Madness!!!!!

Fast-forward.

1964 is the year that Democrat President Lyndon Baines Johnson signed the Civil Rights Act of 1964 ending the oppression of the South's Jim Crow era.

Ya see Johnson was from Texas, another Southern state with ties to Missouri (people from Missouri went to "settle" Texas in the 1800s).
We got ANOTHER Southerner helping out them Negroes?!?!?!?!?!?!?!

DAMN IT!!!!! I WON'T STAND FOR ANY MORE OF THIS BETRAYAL!!!!!
THE DEMOCRATIC PARTY CAN KISS MY ASS!!!!!!!!


FDR's legacy was untouchable (exception for that crap he did to the Japanese-Americans) & the Democrats under this legacy made the Democratic Party virtually unstoppable.
Republican Dwight Eisenhower wasn't crazy enough to retract those New Deal programs which saved the country from the Great Depression. And ironically here we got the Democratic Party helping out the Blacks they once scorned. They're atoning for their wicked past & giving themselves a social & economic legacy that won't be surpassed.

Some of the Republicans did some things for the Blacks in the 1940s & 1950s but the Democrats took up the mantle in the bravest way possible.
The Republican party knew they lost this Black voting block with their inconsistent dithering.
They knew they were about to be Whigged out with all the advances the FDR-legacy Democrats were making.
So to prevent annihilation as a party they added those angry Dixiecrat Democrat bigots to their fold.

Ya see the big money guys are always few in number. They need reliable voting blocks to pad their numbers so their plans get passed. Since they knew they lost the Blacks, why not pick up those guys who hate the Blacks?
They got lots of energy with all that xenophobic anger & that will come in useful for rolling back FDR's policies piece by piece.

Ya see they never got over Rich Guy Franklin Delano Roosevelt betraying them by making his fellow Richies pay max 94% of the taxes instead of max 25%.
The rich knew nobody would be sympathetic to them ESPECIALLY after the economically invaluable U.S. Interstate was built using those heavy tax revenues. How you gonna go into outer space with Sputnik without the big money taxed from the rich boys?

It was gonna take a long time & the passing of generations to begin rolling back FDR's New Deal.

Luckily Johnson gave them an opening with that ignorant Vietnam adventure.
Nixon got in using these angry Dixiecrats in 1968.
They built power in the 1970s using the South's general religious affiliation–Southern Baptist–to begin this Moral Majority strategy.
And then they got in Ronald Reagan in 1980.

That's when they begin the rollback in earnest. With him.
32 years later we're suffering the effects as the Southern bigots & their associated compatriots continue to help the Richies destroy everything FDR's New Deal established as they try to get back at The Negroes & any others they put on level with The Negroes (Muslims, Gays, Asians, Mexicans, etc.).

They're openly calling New Deal/Great Society legacy programs Entitlements now & trying to straight shut them down.
You couldn't do this in 1953. You couldn't do this in 1962. You couldn't do this in 1978. You couldn't even do this in 1985.
But it's being done now.

And all because there is this BIG GROUP OF PEOPLE who hate The Negroes so much that they'll unwittingly hurt themselves trying to hurt those Negroes.
It only adds insult to injury that one of those Negroes is now the Democratic President.

There goes them Democrats helping them Negroes again. Sickening!!!! TRAITORS!!!!!
John Lucas

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

THANK YOU Skittles Sep 2012 #1
It's easy to lose perspective when you think you're being attacked johnlucas Sep 2012 #2
The problem is that SOUTHERNERS need to be doing the correcting... Fawke Em Sep 2012 #27
You SHOULD care. But take your anger out on the ones bringing The South down johnlucas Sep 2012 #36
Yes they do, but we both know they won't and we both know why. And until Y'all stop raising your Egalitarian Thug Sep 2012 #44
OK a million and one props to all the DUers in the red states K8-EEE Sep 2012 #3
We have the "John Birchers" out here (they quit calling themselves that, though) SoCalDem Sep 2012 #50
I grew up in Alabama Scootaloo Sep 2012 #4
it wasn't a long time ago when Texas WAS a blue state... rppper Sep 2012 #6
That was back when the racists had not yet fully left the Democratic Party. Odin2005 Sep 2012 #17
Thank you for this... BeeBee Sep 2012 #5
That's rightly so, johnlucas Jack Sprat Sep 2012 #7
1948 & 1964 is what changed johnlucas Sep 2012 #25
I do not even engage with them. Manifestor_of_Light Sep 2012 #8
Hmm .. but what about my vote here in Georgia? YOHABLO Sep 2012 #9
Ah yes, that stupid argument. Zoeisright Sep 2012 #13
Can you respect that the South is my home? Llewlladdwr Sep 2012 #10
the MAJORITY of people in your "home" are racist pieces of shit scheming daemons Sep 2012 #21
No they're not. Fawke Em Sep 2012 #29
Radio is a BIG reason why it continues johnlucas Sep 2012 #46
I have said the same thing MuseRider Sep 2012 #47
Disagree. area51 Sep 2012 #11
Guilty. Hulk Sep 2012 #12
Locking. UnrepentantLiberal Sep 2012 #14
Unlocking thread. UnrepentantLiberal Sep 2012 #15
That Birtherism is concentrated in the South tells me everything... Odin2005 Sep 2012 #16
Riiight. Orly Taitz is CA. Trump's in New York. DirkGently Sep 2012 #18
Read my post about The Southern Strategy johnlucas Sep 2012 #45
Bingo TroglodyteScholar Sep 2012 #19
There is a flaw in your rationalization of South bashing aikoaiko Sep 2012 #20
That tactic is the calling card of crappy call-out rhetoric here. DirkGently Sep 2012 #24
A better way of direction. Jack Sprat Sep 2012 #55
We're closer than before, sure, but it's still a major problem johnlucas Sep 2012 #26
I whole-heartedly disagree. Fawke Em Sep 2012 #30
Let me know when it's 75% or more in any Northern state. dawg Sep 2012 #33
Well good point but here's a few that approach that number johnlucas Sep 2012 #41
It's wrong to single out any one region. dawg Sep 2012 #43
While recognizing that there are certainly progressive sufrommich Sep 2012 #22
Yes! There is a very good reason that "exceptional southerners" are considered to be...exceptional Tom Ripley Sep 2012 #32
That apparently took nearly 30 years to work. Fawke Em Sep 2012 #39
It goes back further than that, Fawke. Jack Sprat Sep 2012 #51
Here is a position with a longer history of the southern strategy Jack Sprat Sep 2012 #53
The basic problem with all of these threads is that the South is not monolithic. alarimer Sep 2012 #23
And never has been Adsos Letter Sep 2012 #28
True. So people should consider making an honest active commitment to "small" again. nt patrice Sep 2012 #34
And yet my relative moved to NC with her dark skinned cuban boyfriend and was accosted repeatedly. progressivebydesign Sep 2012 #38
Love this!!! One thing: Changing the South "as a whole", if that's what we are waiting for before patrice Sep 2012 #31
Yes you must work within your circle of influence before anything else johnlucas Sep 2012 #57
It's all way overwhelming when you look at the whole thing. Need to start believing in small things patrice Sep 2012 #58
Oh, and one more thing...: Aristus Sep 2012 #35
We do call it out and make fun of it. Fawke Em Sep 2012 #40
Thank you. Keep up the good work. Aristus Sep 2012 #48
I respect that Fawke Em. Thank you johnlucas Sep 2012 #49
Beautifully put!! I'm on the West Coast and don't take insults about it personally. progressivebydesign Sep 2012 #37
Gotta tell ya, a huge amount of the people in my part of the south originated in the NORTH. 1monster Sep 2012 #42
Sad. How is it not bigoted to bash an entire region? Skip Intro Sep 2012 #52
Why are you taking it personally? We're calling out the bigoted mentality not the region johnlucas Sep 2012 #59
Since our efforts were futile last night Jack Sprat Sep 2012 #54
I think I missed the importance of 1968 & RFK johnlucas Sep 2012 #60
Here's something about the North South conflict moving into the Civil war flamingdem Sep 2012 #56
Charlotte NC and Boston MA cwydro Sep 2012 #61
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Message to Llewlladdwr &a...»Reply #25