Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Wasserman Schultz, Democrats did not tilt 2016 primary in Clinton's favor, judicial panel rules [View all]Gothmog
(180,054 posts)29. This lawsuit was a complete farce and had no merit
I have been laughing at the pleadings in this case for a long time. See https://upload.democraticunderground.com/100210544462 The briefs in this case filed by the plaintiffs were so bad that they were funny.
For example, the idiot attorney who filed this silly case claimed that donors were consumers under the DC consumer protection law.
I will miss laughing at the pleadings and briefs in this case
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
94 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Wasserman Schultz, Democrats did not tilt 2016 primary in Clinton's favor, judicial panel rules [View all]
ehrnst
Oct 2019
OP
Sanders folks can't prove or provide evidence to support their claims. But we do know that Sanders
wasupaloopa
Oct 2019
#1
The breach was on a Wednesday, my first email from his campaign was on Friday.
George II
Oct 2019
#21
Bernie was a superdelegate back then. He knew exactly how the system worked when he signed up
ehrnst
Oct 2019
#4
Some people just can't let things go. Only two presidential candidates use the "rigged" term.
George II
Oct 2019
#9
That's from 2017. Have you heard her say this more recently? Her office phone # is: (202) 224-4543
ehrnst
Oct 2019
#66
Not sure why the year matters (but it being 2017 kind of makes it worse, imo)...
PunkinPi
Oct 2019
#72
Right there, in the video you posted, she was being asked her opinion on Donna Brazile's new book.
ehrnst
Oct 2019
#76
Fair point re. the context of Brazile's book. However within days of her book's release,
PunkinPi
Oct 2019
#79
Yes, I hope that we all do due diligence before we speak. However, Warren has shown the ability to
ehrnst
Oct 2019
#80
She was asked a leading question on the fly, and wasn't as deeply involved in any campaign.....
George II
Oct 2019
#81
Yes, grateful for this outcome to put it to rest (hopefully). Will be voting blue, as always, and I
PunkinPi
Oct 2019
#83
Nice evasion. Again - it's not my headline, it's the author's. I provided you with his contact info.
ehrnst
Oct 2019
#77
I copied and pasted the headline. I did not compose it. The author did. See above. (nt)
ehrnst
Oct 2019
#85
I have been following this Jared Beck idiot for a while and laughing at his pleadings and briefs
Gothmog
Oct 2019
#62