General Discussion

ehrnst

(32,640 posts)

85. I copied and pasted the headline. I did not compose it. The author did. See above. (nt)

Reply to former9thward (Reply #54)

Wed Oct 30, 2019, 10:24 AM

Oct 2019

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

94 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Wasserman Schultz, Democrats did not tilt 2016 primary in Clinton's favor, judicial panel rules [View all] ehrnst Oct 2019 OP

Sanders folks can't prove or provide evidence to support their claims. But we do know that Sanders wasupaloopa Oct 2019 #1

I know I started getting emails from the Sanders campaign in December 2015 ehrnst Oct 2019 #3

The breach was on a Wednesday, my first email from his campaign was on Friday. George II Oct 2019 #21

I'm not disputing your account... tonedevil Oct 2019 #28

This story angle was all wrong... Mike Nelson Oct 2019 #2

Bernie was a superdelegate back then. He knew exactly how the system worked when he signed up ehrnst Oct 2019 #4

The Superdelegate system NewJeffCT Oct 2019 #47

Good background. Sanders asked the superdelegates to abuse their Hortensis Oct 2019 #86

I would like to think the ruling would end the argument peggysue2 Oct 2019 #5

Yep. (nt) ehrnst Oct 2019 #6

The ruling was rigged! betsuni Oct 2019 #30

Yep, like Colonel Flagg in MASH treestar Oct 2019 #73

To someone with a hammer, everything looks like a nail. (nt) ehrnst Oct 2019 #78

There's No Stopper To That Whine Me. Oct 2019 #89

This ruling makes me smile Gothmog Oct 2019 #7

Fuck you, Tim Canova. Tommy_Carcetti Oct 2019 #8

.. Cha Oct 2019 #94

Some people just can't let things go. Only two presidential candidates use the "rigged" term. George II Oct 2019 #9

Yep mcar Oct 2019 #20

Correct. sheshe2 Oct 2019 #37

Can someone pls explain why Elizabeth Warren agreed it was rigged? PunkinPi Oct 2019 #64

That's from 2017. Have you heard her say this more recently? Her office phone # is: (202) 224-4543 ehrnst Oct 2019 #66

Not sure why the year matters (but it being 2017 kind of makes it worse, imo)... PunkinPi Oct 2019 #72

Right there, in the video you posted, she was being asked her opinion on Donna Brazile's new book. ehrnst Oct 2019 #76

Fair point re. the context of Brazile's book. However within days of her book's release, PunkinPi Oct 2019 #79

Yes, I hope that we all do due diligence before we speak. However, Warren has shown the ability to ehrnst Oct 2019 #80

Agree with all of your points above. Warren is currently in my top three. nt PunkinPi Oct 2019 #82

She was asked a leading question on the fly, and wasn't as deeply involved in any campaign..... George II Oct 2019 #81

Yes, grateful for this outcome to put it to rest (hopefully). Will be voting blue, as always, and I PunkinPi Oct 2019 #83

No shit. W_HAMILTON Oct 2019 #10

K&R Scurrilous Oct 2019 #11

Post removed Post removed Oct 2019 #12

There absolutely was not "dirty/corrupt and shameful conduct at the DNC." StevieM Oct 2019 #13

No. ismnotwasm Oct 2019 #16

Because you say so? What are your sources or evidence for these smears? ehrnst Oct 2019 #19

This is completely untrue mcar Oct 2019 #22

Let. It. Go. SlogginThroughIt Oct 2019 #14

Tell that to the people who brought this fucked up "lawsuit" obamanut2012 Oct 2019 #25

The decision was today. It's not me who can't let it go. ehrnst Oct 2019 #32

That was a courts decision today. sheshe2 Oct 2019 #40

No I get that. SlogginThroughIt Oct 2019 #71

It's not the party that's keeping this "rigged" myth going. (nt) ehrnst Oct 2019 #91

No one is "picking" any scab. This is signed sealed Cha Oct 2019 #56

That's why people knowing about the court decision now is important. MrsCoffee Oct 2019 #69

Bookmarking because the RIGGED! nonsense is never going away. betsuni Oct 2019 #15

K&R, ***MOST OF DNC & CLINTON ATTACKS WERE FROM RUSSIA!!!*** uponit7771 Oct 2019 #17

This has been obvious since the first claim of "rigged" mcar Oct 2019 #18

Untrue headline as anyone who read the actual decision would know. former9thward Oct 2019 #23

Actually no... ehrnst Oct 2019 #24

Actually yes... former9thward Oct 2019 #26

Which court? There is more than one that has dismissed this bogus lawsuit. ehrnst Oct 2019 #33

And how does that relate to the headline of the OP? former9thward Oct 2019 #52

Nice evasion. Again - it's not my headline, it's the author's. I provided you with his contact info. ehrnst Oct 2019 #77

This lawsuit was a complete farce and had no merit Gothmog Oct 2019 #29

The pleadings may have been poorly written. former9thward Oct 2019 #31

The author of the article/ exec. editor is Jim Saunders. Contact info: ehrnst Oct 2019 #34

You made the headline, you job. former9thward Oct 2019 #54

I copied and pasted the headline. I did not compose it. The author did. See above. (nt) ehrnst Oct 2019 #85

Have you read the opinion? Gothmog Oct 2019 #42

You didn't read it. former9thward Oct 2019 #53

I read and I understood what was in the opinion Gothmog Oct 2019 #57

Yes I am -- are you? former9thward Oct 2019 #65

I am a member of the Bar Gothmog Oct 2019 #75

Good job. Kingofalldems Oct 2019 #84

They did not procedurally qualify or treestar Oct 2019 #74

Was this the lawsuit that JPR was so thrilled about? sheshe2 Oct 2019 #41

Yes-there were a number of JPR posters who signed up to be part of the class Gothmog Oct 2019 #43

Thanks. sheshe2 Oct 2019 #44

Thank you for getting it right. HelpImSurrounded Oct 2019 #51

The headline is correct-this lawsuit was complete and utter garbage Gothmog Oct 2019 #59

Read the opinion-this headline is fine Gothmog Oct 2019 #58

Lawsuit rejected over DNC tilt toward Clinton Gothmog Oct 2019 #60

It was a bogus lawsuit to begin with still_one Oct 2019 #27

By some rather bizarre characters... a Seth Rich murder conspiracy nut.. ehrnst Oct 2019 #39

Wow. That speaks volumes still_one Oct 2019 #45

I have been following this Jared Beck idiot for a while and laughing at his pleadings and briefs Gothmog Oct 2019 #62

The issue isn't whether or not she did it, but that she COULD have rocktivity Oct 2019 #35

K&R Tarheel_Dem Oct 2019 #36

The last gasp of 2016 dies with a whimper Tarc Oct 2019 #38

The paranoia of leaders transfers to their supporters. OldRed2450 Oct 2019 #46

+1000. (nt) ehrnst Oct 2019 #92

I realize it's about Debbie/DNC but really about Hillary so my post is: UTUSN Oct 2019 #48

amazing... bernie has moved on to the next battle...... Takket Oct 2019 #49

He talked about it June of this year. OldRed2450 Oct 2019 #50

Yep. He apparently hasn't gotten past it at all. (nt) ehrnst Oct 2019 #68

BOOKMARKING!!! Anyone disagrees.. Cha Oct 2019 #55

Hi Cha Gothmog Oct 2019 #61

You can still Cha Oct 2019 #63

I won't hold my breath waiting for Blue_Tires Oct 2019 #67

So some are still beating this dead horse Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin Oct 2019 #70

As expected. This decision affirmed what we always knew. Hortensis Oct 2019 #87

Well duh! Of course it wasn't rigged. There was no breach of law. KPN Oct 2019 #88

So, when you say "whole system is rigged" you are omitting the system by which Democratic POTUS ehrnst Oct 2019 #90

bad headline scipan Oct 2019 #93