General Discussion

onenote

(46,323 posts)

38. No. And its stupid and offensive for you to suggest that.

Wed Nov 6, 2019, 03:51 PM

Nov 2019

I'm simply pointing out, as have others here, that while a number of posters are assuming that divulging the whistleblower's name is illegal, that isn't in fact the case.

My posts, including one that you directly responded to, make clear that I think it was reckless and wildly inappropriate for the whistleblower's name to be disclosed. Maybe you should work on your reading comprehension before you comment.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

61 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Trump Jr. recklessly tweets out the name of the Whistleblower. [View all] dewsgirl Nov 2019 OP

Sue the stupid beard right off his face. C_U_L8R Nov 2019 #1

Trump's sharpie strikes again lame54 Nov 2019 #49

What an asshole. Grr. demmiblue Nov 2019 #2

Thank you for posting these. dewsgirl Nov 2019 #8

Let's be very clear brooklynite Nov 2019 #3

Limbaugh and other RWNJ's have been putting this dewsgirl Nov 2019 #11

As Cory Booker said Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin Nov 2019 #47

This message was self-deleted by its author Chin music Nov 2019 #4

Never any repercussions. They go around doing what they damn well please with RKP5637 Nov 2019 #14

Unfortunately, while it was reckless and inappropriate to disclose a name, it isn't illegal to do so onenote Nov 2019 #18

This message was self-deleted by its author Chin music Nov 2019 #35

True. But the law doesn't make it illegal to disclose the identity of a whistleblower onenote Nov 2019 #36

This message was self-deleted by its author Chin music Nov 2019 #37

No. And its stupid and offensive for you to suggest that. onenote Nov 2019 #38

Onenote is simply stating a fact. 11 Bravo Nov 2019 #45

Take the message away from election DEFEAT! bluestarone Nov 2019 #5

I bet you are onto something. dewsgirl Nov 2019 #9

Sooooo desperate for Daddy's approval -- and money. no_hypocrisy Nov 2019 #6

Huh? How would he even know it? n/t BlueStater Nov 2019 #7

Right wing radio has been bouncing his name around since dewsgirl Nov 2019 #10

Where did this story originate??? I know rawstory didn't write it MagickMuffin Nov 2019 #12

He tweeted it out. Limbaugh and RW radio have had dewsgirl Nov 2019 #16

What a perpetual asshole he is!!! n/t RKP5637 Nov 2019 #13

"perpetual asshole" is nice! skip fox Nov 2019 #20

He really is! smirkymonkey Nov 2019 #33

Hoping I don't sound like an a-hole but raw story shouldn't be publishing this Laura PourMeADrink Nov 2019 #15

So Trump Jr. puts a person's life in jeopardy and this is your response? Kingofalldems Nov 2019 #32

What's joepardy.? Laura PourMeADrink Nov 2019 #34

Fixed. Kingofalldems Nov 2019 #40

Snark when snarked. Laura PourMeADrink Nov 2019 #42

Love drudge headlines like this Laura PourMeADrink Nov 2019 #44

That cancerous piece of shit needs to be locked up. onecaliberal Nov 2019 #17

It was indeed reckless and wildly inappropriate, but it wasn't illegal onenote Nov 2019 #19

There should be. Hopefully in the future Whistleblower laws dewsgirl Nov 2019 #22

As "reckless" as Putin's decision. Hortensis Nov 2019 #21

Isn't that breaking some kind of law or obstruction doc03 Nov 2019 #23

No. It's reckless and wildly inappropriate, but not illegal. onenote Nov 2019 #30

In other news, I see Russian propaganda about Victoria Nuland is still alive and well. Tommy_Carcetti Nov 2019 #24

So ScratchCat Nov 2019 #25

The Kremlin actually did it first. And Jr tweeted a brietbart article. Roland99 Nov 2019 #26

It was. I was say possibly to distract from the KY victory. dewsgirl Nov 2019 #27

Nah, distraction from Stone and Ukraine extortion Roland99 Nov 2019 #28

Likely. dewsgirl Nov 2019 #29

And now there is, WH blindsided by Trump Jr's tweet. Whatever.🙄 dewsgirl Nov 2019 #31

Spectator US. Is that Kremlin influenced? Laura PourMeADrink Nov 2019 #43

Spectator US is a recent addition from the U.K.-based Spectator Roland99 Nov 2019 #48

Right...but you said kremlin involved Laura PourMeADrink Nov 2019 #52

Ah. I'm not sure of the details of the kremlin release Roland99 Nov 2019 #54

+1 Laura PourMeADrink Nov 2019 #56

Per daily beast, it was Rand Paul Laura PourMeADrink Nov 2019 #57

The name has been seen here on DU with some blase posters saying no-big-deal UTUSN Nov 2019 #39

I am very happy that most resistors over on Twitter and left dewsgirl Nov 2019 #41

They want the whistleblower to be perceived as the villain. He's a national hero, backed up by Doodley Nov 2019 #46

We're in the middle of a grand jury that's sure to indict Dem2 Nov 2019 #50

It's not "reckless", it's 100% intentional.. Blue_Tires Nov 2019 #51

Unfortunately, I think you are spot on. dewsgirl Nov 2019 #59

Trump wanted that name out there Skidmore Nov 2019 #53

Geez that site sucks. 4 paragraph article and they demand money, then popup a notification window. NCLefty Nov 2019 #55

The name has already been out for a week Raine Nov 2019 #58

Yes but TASS and Don Jr. thought they would put it out there dewsgirl Nov 2019 #60

Such a useless, yet treasonous, piece of shit. Mc Mike Nov 2019 #61