General Discussion

questionseverything

(11,995 posts)

62. that is a long winded way to say my comments are correct

Mon Nov 11, 2019, 03:26 AM

Nov 2019

ur point seems to be if I explain the vote counting process is non transparent, the big bad repubs will see the vote counting process is non transparent

nothing proves the votes were counted incorrectly but nothing you have said proves they were counted correctly

having paper in Georgia is better than no paper but we need human beings to count those paper ballots in an open and transparent manner

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

62 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Brand new touchscreen voting systems failed in GA and PA [View all] diva77 Nov 2019 OP

We had a choice True Blue American Nov 2019 #1

would be interested to know which county & state offered this choice diva77 Nov 2019 #2

Montgomery County, Ohio True Blue American Nov 2019 #13

Was the ballot generated by the machine? or were you handed a paper ballot that you hand marked? diva77 Nov 2019 #41

Handed a ballot True Blue American Nov 2019 #42

That's the system here in Broome County NY. rickford66 Nov 2019 #8

That's what we use in my deep blue county in N.C. yardwork Nov 2019 #10

The title is very misleading. There was no "failure" grantcart Nov 2019 #11

of course there is no proof that any reported votes were correctly reported questionseverything Nov 2019 #35

that's not the point. The point is that the article on which this blog is based recorded grantcart Nov 2019 #37

Election integrity is a nonpartisan issue. The machines are nontransparent regardless diva77 Nov 2019 #38

Facts are a non partisan issue. Wild inaccurate exageration undermines people's interest grantcart Nov 2019 #48

a paper ballot, hand marked would not cause a voter to have to wait longer, or switch booths to vote diva77 Nov 2019 #49

"I am done with this exchange" stopdiggin Nov 2019 #51

the truth is no human being can verify that software is doing what we are told it is doing questionseverything Nov 2019 #60

Your comments have nothing to do with mine grantcart Nov 2019 #61

that is a long winded way to say my comments are correct questionseverything Nov 2019 #62

when the vote counting process is not open and transparent it is just a trust me system questionseverything Nov 2019 #44

Drivers license True Blue American Nov 2019 #43

Paper trail MUST be provided. James48 Nov 2019 #3

Absolutely. Election security is not an issue only for those who cheat. . . . . nt Bernardo de La Paz Nov 2019 #5

I have been doing that for 15 years in Pa. gab13by13 Nov 2019 #7

Allowing you to take proof of who you voted for from the voting place Ms. Toad Nov 2019 #12

And those problems exist for absentee ballots exboyfil Nov 2019 #26

Correct - but the benefit of allowing people who are unable to get to the polls Ms. Toad Nov 2019 #34

Paper trails are scanned True Blue American Nov 2019 #14

DITTO Snoopy 7 Nov 2019 #4

The ES&S machines here in Philly were confusing for many elderly BumRushDaShow Nov 2019 #6

No scanner? True Blue American Nov 2019 #15

I'm assuming the ballots are removed from the machines once voting is completed BumRushDaShow Nov 2019 #18

a scanner is another way to hide real ballots from real people Hermit-The-Prog Nov 2019 #39

I agree BumRushDaShow Nov 2019 #40

exactly scanners can be programmed to give incorrect results just like touchscreens questionseverything Nov 2019 #45

No you don't DeminPennswoods Nov 2019 #16

You are conflating "human error" (in reading/transcription), which can be rectified by others BumRushDaShow Nov 2019 #19

Well, my point is, it would be very easy to add (or subtract) DeminPennswoods Nov 2019 #24

Well I know the lever machines were monstrosities BumRushDaShow Nov 2019 #27

Agree, it's more complicated DeminPennswoods Nov 2019 #30

LOL!!!!! BumRushDaShow Nov 2019 #31

Didn't you guys get to test run them at various DeminPennswoods Nov 2019 #25

They had minimally-advertised "demos" at various locations around the city BumRushDaShow Nov 2019 #29

When I first True Blue American Nov 2019 #22

BTW, the voting bill Gov Wolf just signed DeminPennswoods Nov 2019 #17

I posted that in the PA forum yesterday! BumRushDaShow Nov 2019 #20

This message was self-deleted by its author Chin music Nov 2019 #9

Let me guess, these issues disproportionately harmed Democrats? Garrett78 Nov 2019 #21

*pretends to be shocked* Initech Nov 2019 #23

One thing we have to do is stop having some much exboyfil Nov 2019 #28

so you want to have separate ballots? stopdiggin Nov 2019 #52

I wonder if these are the ones Ivanka is involved with?🙄 dewsgirl Nov 2019 #32

I voted on one of those new and not-so-improved machines meow2u3 Nov 2019 #33

the races should all be hand counted in transparent full public view questionseverything Nov 2019 #36

Maybe that worked in 1872. There are just too many people voting in modern times. nt Blue_true Nov 2019 #47

there are still hand counted communities/sort and stack goes quickly questionseverything Nov 2019 #50

you have federal, state and local offices stopdiggin Nov 2019 #53

I am lucky enough to live in a county where local issues and races are not voted on Blue_true Nov 2019 #58

is why i said , count the federal offices by hand questionseverything Nov 2019 #59

Most new systems have bugs, some major bugs. Blue_true Nov 2019 #46

Call me simple but we have been using a potential device for years. Plop an eye scanner on it, Hearthrob Nov 2019 #56

Sorry, I am not as conspiratorial about some things that just happen in life. nt Blue_true Nov 2019 #57

My polling place is a catholic church, yortsed snacilbuper Nov 2019 #54

Corruption rockfordfile Nov 2019 #55