Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

(4,625 posts)

12. Right- this is why "I don't recall" is such a popular answer from those on trial nt

Tue Nov 12, 2019, 11:01 PM

Nov 2019

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

26 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Why does Chuck Rosenberg always put so much emphasis of proof of whether some act is [View all] triron Nov 2019 OP

I don't get negativity from him at all, that he's pnwest Nov 2019 #2

Umm... Because it is the law! Cartaphelius Nov 2019 #3

You're talking about two different things StarfishSaver Nov 2019 #13

....but is it BEYOND a reasonable doubt? Stallion Nov 2019 #18

Exactly StarfishSaver Nov 2019 #14

I listened to the interview. I didn't hear any "shade" at all. TomSlick Nov 2019 #5

TomSlick's exactly right StarfishSaver Nov 2019 #15

And that's why we drive our clients crazy. TomSlick Nov 2019 #19

:-) StarfishSaver Nov 2019 #21

We Charge More for Latin Words and Confusing Words Like "Inapposite" Stallion Nov 2019 #22

What really gets expensive is when I quote literature. TomSlick Nov 2019 #24

He was talking about proving perjury and he made perfect sense. greyl Nov 2019 #6

Wow I would like you on my jury if I am ever accused of perjury. triron Nov 2019 #9

I don't get the feeling you're reading for comprehension, greyl Nov 2019 #11

ohhh. burn! (nt) stopdiggin Nov 2019 #26

He's explaining the law as he knows it. NCLefty Nov 2019 #17